Add to ORKGAndrew Koppelman has offered a challenge to Brian Leiter\u27s view that the proper public attitude toward religion is one of tolerance rather than active respect. Let us explore the nature of that challenge and offer a few observations on the topic
In Why Tolerate Religion?, Brian Leiter argues against the special legal status of religion, claimin...
Religion’s place in American public life has never been fixed. As new communities have arrived, as o...
Notwithstanding the notorious difficulty of defining religion and the consequent effort on the part ...
Andrew Koppelman has offered a challenge to Brian Leiter\u27s view that the proper public attitude t...
In two recent papers, Brian Leiter argues that there is no good reason for law to single out religio...
In two recent papers, Brian Leiter argues that there is no good reason for law to single out religio...
In two recent papers, Brian Leiter argues that there is no good reason for law to single out religio...
Reviewing Andrew Koppelma, Defending American Religious Neutrality (2013), and Brian Leiter, Why Tol...
This paper is a short response to an address, “And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in ...
Crucial to Leiter’s overall case is the claim that there is no credible reason to accommodate religi...
What makes religion distinctive, and how does answering that question help us answer questions regar...
Blog post, “Why Tolerate Religion? Because Secularists Need It“ discusses politics, theology and the...
The debate among legal scholars about whether religion is special is chronically confused by the sch...
Blog post, “Why Tolerate Religion?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion...
Blog post, “Why Tolerate Religion“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion ...
In Why Tolerate Religion?, Brian Leiter argues against the special legal status of religion, claimin...
Religion’s place in American public life has never been fixed. As new communities have arrived, as o...
Notwithstanding the notorious difficulty of defining religion and the consequent effort on the part ...
Andrew Koppelman has offered a challenge to Brian Leiter\u27s view that the proper public attitude t...
In two recent papers, Brian Leiter argues that there is no good reason for law to single out religio...
In two recent papers, Brian Leiter argues that there is no good reason for law to single out religio...
In two recent papers, Brian Leiter argues that there is no good reason for law to single out religio...
Reviewing Andrew Koppelma, Defending American Religious Neutrality (2013), and Brian Leiter, Why Tol...
This paper is a short response to an address, “And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in ...
Crucial to Leiter’s overall case is the claim that there is no credible reason to accommodate religi...
What makes religion distinctive, and how does answering that question help us answer questions regar...
Blog post, “Why Tolerate Religion? Because Secularists Need It“ discusses politics, theology and the...
The debate among legal scholars about whether religion is special is chronically confused by the sch...
Blog post, “Why Tolerate Religion?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion...
Blog post, “Why Tolerate Religion“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion ...
In Why Tolerate Religion?, Brian Leiter argues against the special legal status of religion, claimin...
Religion’s place in American public life has never been fixed. As new communities have arrived, as o...
Notwithstanding the notorious difficulty of defining religion and the consequent effort on the part ...