Add to ORKGhttp://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xv148c8# This report includes (1) an overview of the state of peer review in the Academy at large, (2) a set of recommendations for moving forward, (3) a proposed research agenda to examine in depth the effects of academic status-seeking on the entire academic enterprise, (4) proceedings from the workshop on the four topics noted above, and (5) four substantial and broadly conceived background papers on the workshop topics, with associated literature reviews
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessme...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xv148c8# This report includes (1) an overview of the state of peer ...
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Cen...
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Cen...
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Commu...
This report recommends creating a wider array of institutionally acceptable and cost-effective alter...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessme...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xv148c8# This report includes (1) an overview of the state of peer ...
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Cen...
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Cen...
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Commu...
This report recommends creating a wider array of institutionally acceptable and cost-effective alter...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
The use of peer review within both the scholarly communication system and the UK's research assessme...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...