Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of reviewers who possess some expertise in the relevant area. This article discusses the purpose of reviewing manuscripts for publication in scholarly journals. Various aspects and issues of the peer review process are described, including reviewer responsibilities. Criticisms and concerns associated with the current peer review system are addressed, as well as guidelines for reviewing manuscripts. Finally, recommendations for improving the peer review process are provided
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Aims To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer reviewe...
ost scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually d...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...
Scholarly journals provide a record of the research, issues, and concerns of a field. Authors have t...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
There is need for large numbers of high-quality peer reviews across journals. This chapter provides ...
The quality and reputation of an academic journal can depend on several factors, but high-quality pe...
eer review seems to have had its origins in 18th century England to combat plagiarism (1). But today...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
This article explains the role of the peer reviewer in assessing the suitability of a research paper...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Aims To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer reviewe...
ost scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually d...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
Peer review is a central tenet in research across all disciplines. It is a key feature in monitoring...
Scholarly journals provide a record of the research, issues, and concerns of a field. Authors have t...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
There is need for large numbers of high-quality peer reviews across journals. This chapter provides ...
The quality and reputation of an academic journal can depend on several factors, but high-quality pe...
eer review seems to have had its origins in 18th century England to combat plagiarism (1). But today...
The review process of academic, scientific research and its basic tenets is considered, thereby dist...
This article explains the role of the peer reviewer in assessing the suitability of a research paper...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
Objective: To describe the process of scientific peer review as it is used in the manuscript submiss...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Aims To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer reviewe...