There is need for large numbers of high-quality peer reviews across journals. This chapter provides information about the peer-review process and practical recommendations from the perspective of journal editorial team members. It describes expectations for peer reviewers, suggests a process to follow when reviewing, and offers resources to support high-quality reviewing. It introduces key ethical guidelines to follow while reviewing and describes how to get involved, stay engaged, and mentor others in reviewing
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
This editorial provides an overview of the editorial process at one peer-reviewed publication. The e...
Peer- and editorial review of research submitted to biomedical journals ('manuscript review') is fre...
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scruti...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
ost scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually d...
The quality and reputation of an academic journal can depend on several factors, but high-quality pe...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
Peer review of journal articles is now the norm in virtually all scientific disciplines. The art of ...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
The purpose of peer review is to uphold the integrity of the publishing journal, improve upon resear...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
This editorial provides an overview of the editorial process at one peer-reviewed publication. The e...
Peer- and editorial review of research submitted to biomedical journals ('manuscript review') is fre...
Peer reviewed manuscripts contain a certain level of merit, as they have survived the scrutiny of re...
Peer review is the process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scruti...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
ost scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually d...
The quality and reputation of an academic journal can depend on several factors, but high-quality pe...
Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as reviewers (or referees) for submitted paper...
Peer review of journal articles is now the norm in virtually all scientific disciplines. The art of ...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
The quality of an article is a critical parameter for the success of any scholarly journal, and the ...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
The purpose of peer review is to uphold the integrity of the publishing journal, improve upon resear...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
This editorial provides an overview of the editorial process at one peer-reviewed publication. The e...
Peer- and editorial review of research submitted to biomedical journals ('manuscript review') is fre...