Add to ORKGThis article contends that the public is deprived of an important source of information on public affairs issues as a result of the section 399(a) prohibition on editorializing. After an examination of the legislative history of Section 399(a), and the heritage of broadcast regulation in the United States, the article concludes that the prohibition on editorializing is an improper restriction on free expression in violation of the First Amendment
In recent years, a large number of disputes have arisen in which parties invoke the First Amendment,...
Until it was abolished by the Federal Communications Commission in 1987, the Fairness Doctrine was t...
The newspaper industry has recently experienced economic difficulty. Profits have declined because f...
This article contends that the public is deprived of an important source of information on public af...
The purpose of this article is to examine critically these decisions and to explore whether there is...
In Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters, the United States Supreme Court stru...
In the new economy driven by the telecommunications industry, the FCC is a busy agency. Given the ...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
The United States Supreme Court, in FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, had a magnificent opportunity to eit...
During the past half century there have existed in this country two opposing constitutional traditio...
This article focuses on the question of whether state-imposed public access requirements violate the...
The article considers both the constitutional and statutory aspects of the regulation of indecency i...
The newspaper industry has recently experienced economic difficulty. Profits have declined because f...
The passage of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 offered the blueprint for the modern system of pu...
When confronted with regulations which permit others to have access to their media, cable television...
In recent years, a large number of disputes have arisen in which parties invoke the First Amendment,...
Until it was abolished by the Federal Communications Commission in 1987, the Fairness Doctrine was t...
The newspaper industry has recently experienced economic difficulty. Profits have declined because f...
This article contends that the public is deprived of an important source of information on public af...
The purpose of this article is to examine critically these decisions and to explore whether there is...
In Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters, the United States Supreme Court stru...
In the new economy driven by the telecommunications industry, the FCC is a busy agency. Given the ...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
The United States Supreme Court, in FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, had a magnificent opportunity to eit...
During the past half century there have existed in this country two opposing constitutional traditio...
This article focuses on the question of whether state-imposed public access requirements violate the...
The article considers both the constitutional and statutory aspects of the regulation of indecency i...
The newspaper industry has recently experienced economic difficulty. Profits have declined because f...
The passage of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 offered the blueprint for the modern system of pu...
When confronted with regulations which permit others to have access to their media, cable television...
In recent years, a large number of disputes have arisen in which parties invoke the First Amendment,...
Until it was abolished by the Federal Communications Commission in 1987, the Fairness Doctrine was t...
The newspaper industry has recently experienced economic difficulty. Profits have declined because f...