Until it was abolished by the Federal Communications Commission in 1987, the Fairness Doctrine was the clearest symbol of broadcasting\u27s second-rate first amendment status. This Article traces the history and demise of the Fairness Doctrine and urges Congress to abandon current efforts to enact the Doctrine into law. The author proposes, instead, a system of access that provides broadcast journalists with the full first amendment protection they have long sought, and at the same time protects and enhances the public\u27s interest in broadcasting
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
In 1987, the FCC repealed broadcasting\u27s Fairness Doctrine. This longestablished Doctrine require...
Changes in the political and regulatory climates are prompting calls to revive substantive governmen...
The author recently testified in the current hearings conducted by the U.S. House Subcommittee on Co...
In light of the deregulatory fever currently in vogue in Washington, claims of a first amendment r...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
The Federal Communications Commission recently voted to urge congressional repeal of the equal oppor...
Changes in the political and regulatory climates are prompting calls to revive substantive governmen...
This thesis poses the argument that the Fairness Doctrine, which grew out of the “public interest” r...
The abolition of the Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission provides an opportun...
The Fairness Doctrine-and broadcasters\u27 obligation to present both sides of controversial public ...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Comm...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
In 1987, the FCC repealed broadcasting\u27s Fairness Doctrine. This longestablished Doctrine require...
Changes in the political and regulatory climates are prompting calls to revive substantive governmen...
The author recently testified in the current hearings conducted by the U.S. House Subcommittee on Co...
In light of the deregulatory fever currently in vogue in Washington, claims of a first amendment r...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
The Federal Communications Commission recently voted to urge congressional repeal of the equal oppor...
Changes in the political and regulatory climates are prompting calls to revive substantive governmen...
This thesis poses the argument that the Fairness Doctrine, which grew out of the “public interest” r...
The abolition of the Fairness Doctrine by the Federal Communications Commission provides an opportun...
The Fairness Doctrine-and broadcasters\u27 obligation to present both sides of controversial public ...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Comm...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
Despite its repeal in 1987, the fairness doctrine remains one of the most controversial issues in br...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...