Add to ORKGThis Note argues that denials of motions for appointment of counsel should be immediately appealable under the collateral order exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Part I examines the extent to which the collateral order doctrine modifies the finality rule. It argues that recent Supreme Court decisions that at first appear to have narrowed the doctrine have in fact only restated it. Part II applies the collateral order doctrine to orders denying appointment of counsel, concluding that such denials qualify for immediate review. Part III argues that policy considerations support this conclusion
A proper notice of appeal is a necessary first step inmost federal appeals. But federal litigants so...
This Note attempts to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals by examining the interests af...
On May 6, 2021, in Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circ...
This Note argues that denials of motions for appointment of counsel should be immediately appealable...
On April 12, 2016, in Doe v. Village of Deerfield, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sevent...
On April 12, 2016, in Doe v. Village of Deerfield, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sevent...
This Note attempts to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals by examining the interests af...
This articles addresses the collateral order doctrine beginning with its inception in Cohen v. Benef...
The collateral order doctrine is perhaps the most significant exception to the general rule that onl...
The federal courts of appeals are split over whether an order denying confirmation of a reorganizati...
This Recent Development will trace briefly the history of the collateral order doctrine, focusing on...
Reserving appeals to final judgments has a long history in the federal courts, as do exceptions to t...
On April 12, 2016, in Doe v. Village of Deerfield, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sevent...
Litigants in federal district courts more often are asking judges to disqualify themselves from case...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed a wide array of significant is...
A proper notice of appeal is a necessary first step inmost federal appeals. But federal litigants so...
This Note attempts to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals by examining the interests af...
On May 6, 2021, in Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circ...
This Note argues that denials of motions for appointment of counsel should be immediately appealable...
On April 12, 2016, in Doe v. Village of Deerfield, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sevent...
On April 12, 2016, in Doe v. Village of Deerfield, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sevent...
This Note attempts to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals by examining the interests af...
This articles addresses the collateral order doctrine beginning with its inception in Cohen v. Benef...
The collateral order doctrine is perhaps the most significant exception to the general rule that onl...
The federal courts of appeals are split over whether an order denying confirmation of a reorganizati...
This Recent Development will trace briefly the history of the collateral order doctrine, focusing on...
Reserving appeals to final judgments has a long history in the federal courts, as do exceptions to t...
On April 12, 2016, in Doe v. Village of Deerfield, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sevent...
Litigants in federal district courts more often are asking judges to disqualify themselves from case...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed a wide array of significant is...
A proper notice of appeal is a necessary first step inmost federal appeals. But federal litigants so...
This Note attempts to resolve the conflict among the courts of appeals by examining the interests af...
On May 6, 2021, in Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circ...