This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 1976 imposed on cable operators. The authors assert that changing conditions in the cable industry have eliminated the original need for a strict royalty schedule, and that the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, in its discretion, should adopt new rates which reflect those reasonably charged in the marketplace. The authors additionally argue that Congress itself should use this marketplace approach to amend the statutory rates applied to distant signal programming retransmitted by cable
Free-to-air television stations remain the most popular source of programming, even in pay TV househ...
Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Every da...
Since 1970, the FCC has prohibited all telephone companies from providing video programming in their...
This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 197...
The author examines the cable-copyright issue of whether Congress should impose full copyright liabi...
The 1992 Cable Act completely overhauls the legal rules governing the television marketplace, and it...
The 1976 Act showed foresight in extending the section 115 compulsory phonorecord license model to s...
A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Most U....
This Article surveys a controversial issue involving both Canadian and United States copyright inter...
The way we consume media today is vastly different from the way media was consumed in 1976, when the...
One of the fundamental purposes of the 1992 Cable Act was to bring about a reduction in consumer cab...
In many communities across the nation cable subscribers depend on government-owned cable television ...
The study aims to examine the terrestrial broadcasting retrans- mission issue of CATV and to suggest...
Public concern over cable television\u27s status as a monopoly has generated a movement to allow loc...
The Cable Act of 1992 required, for the first time, that cable systems receive the consent of broadc...
Free-to-air television stations remain the most popular source of programming, even in pay TV househ...
Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Every da...
Since 1970, the FCC has prohibited all telephone companies from providing video programming in their...
This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 197...
The author examines the cable-copyright issue of whether Congress should impose full copyright liabi...
The 1992 Cable Act completely overhauls the legal rules governing the television marketplace, and it...
The 1976 Act showed foresight in extending the section 115 compulsory phonorecord license model to s...
A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Most U....
This Article surveys a controversial issue involving both Canadian and United States copyright inter...
The way we consume media today is vastly different from the way media was consumed in 1976, when the...
One of the fundamental purposes of the 1992 Cable Act was to bring about a reduction in consumer cab...
In many communities across the nation cable subscribers depend on government-owned cable television ...
The study aims to examine the terrestrial broadcasting retrans- mission issue of CATV and to suggest...
Public concern over cable television\u27s status as a monopoly has generated a movement to allow loc...
The Cable Act of 1992 required, for the first time, that cable systems receive the consent of broadc...
Free-to-air television stations remain the most popular source of programming, even in pay TV househ...
Correspondence issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Every da...
Since 1970, the FCC has prohibited all telephone companies from providing video programming in their...