This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 1976 imposed on cable operators. The authors assert that changing conditions in the cable industry have eliminated the original need for a strict royalty schedule, and that the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, in its discretion, should adopt new rates which reflect those reasonably charged in the marketplace. The authors additionally argue that Congress itself should use this marketplace approach to amend the statutory rates applied to distant signal programming retransmitted by cable
The way we consume media today is vastly different from the way media was consumed in 1976, when the...
The cable television industry has received seemingly inconsistent treatment from the Federal Communi...
The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the Cable Act ) was a comprehensive amendment to the C...
This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 197...
The author examines the cable-copyright issue of whether Congress should impose full copyright liabi...
The 1976 Act showed foresight in extending the section 115 compulsory phonorecord license model to s...
Here is the problem as Congress saw it: A distributor of television programming (a cable television ...
The Cable Act of 1992 required, for the first time, that cable systems receive the consent of broadc...
The FCC\u27s pay cable policy to increase television diversity through deregulation has backfired. O...
The 1992 Cable Act completely overhauls the legal rules governing the television marketplace, and it...
This Article surveys a controversial issue involving both Canadian and United States copyright inter...
In many communities across the nation cable subscribers depend on government-owned cable television ...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
Public concern over cable television\u27s status as a monopoly has generated a movement to allow loc...
One of the fundamental purposes of the 1992 Cable Act was to bring about a reduction in consumer cab...
The way we consume media today is vastly different from the way media was consumed in 1976, when the...
The cable television industry has received seemingly inconsistent treatment from the Federal Communi...
The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the Cable Act ) was a comprehensive amendment to the C...
This article examines the compulsory licensing royalty rates which the Copyright Revision Act of 197...
The author examines the cable-copyright issue of whether Congress should impose full copyright liabi...
The 1976 Act showed foresight in extending the section 115 compulsory phonorecord license model to s...
Here is the problem as Congress saw it: A distributor of television programming (a cable television ...
The Cable Act of 1992 required, for the first time, that cable systems receive the consent of broadc...
The FCC\u27s pay cable policy to increase television diversity through deregulation has backfired. O...
The 1992 Cable Act completely overhauls the legal rules governing the television marketplace, and it...
This Article surveys a controversial issue involving both Canadian and United States copyright inter...
In many communities across the nation cable subscribers depend on government-owned cable television ...
The issues of access and cable television regulation pose serious constitutional questions. This art...
Public concern over cable television\u27s status as a monopoly has generated a movement to allow loc...
One of the fundamental purposes of the 1992 Cable Act was to bring about a reduction in consumer cab...
The way we consume media today is vastly different from the way media was consumed in 1976, when the...
The cable television industry has received seemingly inconsistent treatment from the Federal Communi...
The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the Cable Act ) was a comprehensive amendment to the C...