Five years ago, Shelby County v. Holder released nine states and fifty-five smaller jurisdictions from the preclearance obligation set forth in section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). This obligation mandated that places with a history of discrimination in voting obtain federal approval—known as preclearance—before changing any electoral rule or procedure. Within hours of the Shelby County decision, jurisdictions began moving to reenact measures section 5 had specifically blocked. Others pressed forward with new rules that the VRA would have barred prior to Shelby County
The United States Supreme Court effectively dismantled the pre-clearance provision of the Voting Rig...
As with other questions of constitutional law, the key to Shelby County is, “who decides?” Congres...
Congress voted last summer to reauthorize the expiring provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Among th...
Five years ago, Shelby County v. Holder released nine states and fifty-five smaller jurisdictions fr...
Five years ago, Shelby County v. Holder released nine states and fifty-five smaller jurisdictions fr...
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed with the intention of providing all Americans with the equa...
In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court dismantled one of the two pillars of the Voting Rights...
From the passage of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in 1965 until the summer of 2013, several states wer...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
Decided on June 23, 2013, Shelby County v. Holder scrapped the coverage formula set forth in Section...
The passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) was a momentous occasion for minority voters in t...
Since the United States Supreme Court struck down section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act ( VRA ) and ...
While minorities have experienced great progress because of the Voting Rights Act, particularly sect...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
The United States Supreme Court effectively dismantled the pre-clearance provision of the Voting Rig...
As with other questions of constitutional law, the key to Shelby County is, “who decides?” Congres...
Congress voted last summer to reauthorize the expiring provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Among th...
Five years ago, Shelby County v. Holder released nine states and fifty-five smaller jurisdictions fr...
Five years ago, Shelby County v. Holder released nine states and fifty-five smaller jurisdictions fr...
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed with the intention of providing all Americans with the equa...
In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court dismantled one of the two pillars of the Voting Rights...
From the passage of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in 1965 until the summer of 2013, several states wer...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
Decided on June 23, 2013, Shelby County v. Holder scrapped the coverage formula set forth in Section...
The passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) was a momentous occasion for minority voters in t...
Since the United States Supreme Court struck down section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act ( VRA ) and ...
While minorities have experienced great progress because of the Voting Rights Act, particularly sect...
Section V of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required covered jurisdictions to obtain “preclearance” bef...
The United States Supreme Court effectively dismantled the pre-clearance provision of the Voting Rig...
As with other questions of constitutional law, the key to Shelby County is, “who decides?” Congres...
Congress voted last summer to reauthorize the expiring provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Among th...