This short article considers the central differences in the law on taking jurisdiction in civil and commercial disputes between those common law provinces that have implemented a statute on jurisdiction (British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Saskatchewan) and those common law provinces that rely on the common law (Alberta, Ontario, and others). It focuses on the distinction between presence and ordinary residence, the role and analysis of presumptive connecting factors for taking jurisdiction, and issues related to immovable property
This series of two articles provides a comparative overview of the position in common-law jurisdicti...
This paper deals with the interaction of insolvency and secured transactions law in a “bijural” juri...
In his text Christopher Richter describes how Quebec courts determine their jurisdiction over commer...
This short article considers the central differences in the law on taking jurisdiction in civil and ...
In recent years, property theorists have offered varying accounts as to what exactly ownership is, t...
Part I reviews the development of the Canadian common-law approach prior to the Court's decision in ...
The article examines the various provincial and territorial statutory regimes that apply to resolve ...
The author explores the concept of inherent jurisdiction in the context of its use and application b...
The nature of land tenure rights is defined in many different ways in different jurisdictions. One o...
“General jurisdiction” refers to a court’s competence to adjudicate disputes arising out of a defend...
This study investigates whether and how Canadian courts may assume jurisdiction (both criminal and c...
In 2016, the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (“CJPTA”) marked its tenth year in forc...
While the shortcomings of the common law rules of private international law were being reformed by s...
This article describes three different approaches to Aboriginal title in Canada: (1) a common law ap...
The conventional wisdom has been that the Canadian provincial Crowns are immune from the jurisdictio...
This series of two articles provides a comparative overview of the position in common-law jurisdicti...
This paper deals with the interaction of insolvency and secured transactions law in a “bijural” juri...
In his text Christopher Richter describes how Quebec courts determine their jurisdiction over commer...
This short article considers the central differences in the law on taking jurisdiction in civil and ...
In recent years, property theorists have offered varying accounts as to what exactly ownership is, t...
Part I reviews the development of the Canadian common-law approach prior to the Court's decision in ...
The article examines the various provincial and territorial statutory regimes that apply to resolve ...
The author explores the concept of inherent jurisdiction in the context of its use and application b...
The nature of land tenure rights is defined in many different ways in different jurisdictions. One o...
“General jurisdiction” refers to a court’s competence to adjudicate disputes arising out of a defend...
This study investigates whether and how Canadian courts may assume jurisdiction (both criminal and c...
In 2016, the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (“CJPTA”) marked its tenth year in forc...
While the shortcomings of the common law rules of private international law were being reformed by s...
This article describes three different approaches to Aboriginal title in Canada: (1) a common law ap...
The conventional wisdom has been that the Canadian provincial Crowns are immune from the jurisdictio...
This series of two articles provides a comparative overview of the position in common-law jurisdicti...
This paper deals with the interaction of insolvency and secured transactions law in a “bijural” juri...
In his text Christopher Richter describes how Quebec courts determine their jurisdiction over commer...