On October 27, 2017, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules held a Symposium to obtain input and guidance on critical matters involving the admissibility of expert testimony. The Symposium consisted of presentations and discussions by brilliant scientists, outstanding federal judges, academics with deep expertise in both evidence and science, and stellar practitioners from private and public practice. The transcript of the Symposium and the accompanying articles establish an important agenda for the Advisory Committee to tackle over the next few years
This book offers a complete update of Monograph No. 6 focusing entirely on state and federal court e...
Questions Presented: Has Federal Rule 702 established a workable standard for expert testimony? How ...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
On October 27, 2017, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules held a Symposium t...
This conference was held on October 19, 2018, at University of Denver Sturm College of Law under the...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
As the first major revision since 2000 of the landmark handbook on expert testimony, this fourth edi...
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimon...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
Handout from a day-long lecture on expert and scientific testimony at the Maryland Judicial Institut...
Debate concerning the limits of judicial power over expert witnesses remains active and in its early...
In response to PCAST’s recommendation, the Standing Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules convened a ...
A major revision of the landmark book on expert testimony Feder’s Succeeding as an Expert Witness, S...
This book offers a complete update of Monograph No. 6 focusing entirely on state and federal court e...
Questions Presented: Has Federal Rule 702 established a workable standard for expert testimony? How ...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...
On October 27, 2017, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules held a Symposium t...
This conference was held on October 19, 2018, at University of Denver Sturm College of Law under the...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
As the first major revision since 2000 of the landmark handbook on expert testimony, this fourth edi...
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimon...
Modern science forces the world to accept new theories and invention. Science has invented several t...
Handout from a day-long lecture on expert and scientific testimony at the Maryland Judicial Institut...
Debate concerning the limits of judicial power over expert witnesses remains active and in its early...
In response to PCAST’s recommendation, the Standing Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules convened a ...
A major revision of the landmark book on expert testimony Feder’s Succeeding as an Expert Witness, S...
This book offers a complete update of Monograph No. 6 focusing entirely on state and federal court e...
Questions Presented: Has Federal Rule 702 established a workable standard for expert testimony? How ...
There is a generally accepted narrative about the development of the rules governing the admissibili...