On October 27, 2017, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules held a Symposium to obtain input and guidance on critical matters involving the admissibility of expert testimony. The Symposium consisted of presentations and discussions by brilliant scientists, outstanding federal judges, academics with deep expertise in both evidence and science, and stellar practitioners from private and public practice. The transcript of the Symposium and the accompanying articles establish an important agenda for the Advisory Committee to tackle over the next few years
The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confro...
It is a great privilege and honor to be asked to participate in even a small way in the work of the ...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...
On October 27, 2017, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules held a Symposium t...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This conference was held on October 19, 2018, at University of Denver Sturm College of Law under the...
In response to PCAST’s recommendation, the Standing Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules convened a ...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which covers testimony by expert witnesses, allows a witness to testif...
A recent report of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology questioned the vali...
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimon...
The 2000 amendments to Rule 702 sought to resolve the debate that had emerged in the courts in the 1...
The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confro...
It is a great privilege and honor to be asked to participate in even a small way in the work of the ...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...
On October 27, 2017, the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules held a Symposium t...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This conference was held on October 19, 2018, at University of Denver Sturm College of Law under the...
In response to PCAST’s recommendation, the Standing Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules convened a ...
With regard to criminal cases, the focus of this Article, judges face significant challenges in ruli...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which covers testimony by expert witnesses, allows a witness to testif...
A recent report of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology questioned the vali...
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimon...
The 2000 amendments to Rule 702 sought to resolve the debate that had emerged in the courts in the 1...
The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confro...
It is a great privilege and honor to be asked to participate in even a small way in the work of the ...
This Article highlights lingering confusion in the caselaw as to the proper standard for the trial c...