Examining the policy considerations underlying the award of punitive damages, the authors conclude that, contrary to the views of punitive damage abolitionists, there are circumstances in which punitive damages are appropriate. The authors propose a reform in the procedures used to determine when puntive damages should be imposed and describe guidelines for assessing the amount of damages
Nineteenth-century debate on punitive damages has led to an apparently un- bridgeable gap between Am...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., suggested that...
Following the recognition by the House of Lords in AG v Blake of the gain-based remedy of an account...
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
Abstract: This entry concerns punitive damages. In considering the rationale for the award of puniti...
Punitive damages are a species of non-compensatory damages. Their principal purpose is to punish the...
After a comparative review of the law on punitive damages in the United Kingdom, Canada and the Unit...
This paper questions the utility of courts continuing to award punitive damages. It argues that the...
A contemporary theory of punitive damages must answer two questions: (1) what place, if any, do puni...
The limitations on a punitive damage award depend on the conception of punitive damages. Is it a pri...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
In light of increasing punitive damages awards, the United States Supreme Court formulated criteria ...
It has long been orthodoxy that punitive damages, because they are awarded in order to punish, are a...
Punitive damages and class actions can be viewed as sharing a common economic function – creating op...
This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compe...
Nineteenth-century debate on punitive damages has led to an apparently un- bridgeable gap between Am...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., suggested that...
Following the recognition by the House of Lords in AG v Blake of the gain-based remedy of an account...
Punitive, or exemplary damages, have been recognized in the Anglo-American common law systems for tw...
Abstract: This entry concerns punitive damages. In considering the rationale for the award of puniti...
Punitive damages are a species of non-compensatory damages. Their principal purpose is to punish the...
After a comparative review of the law on punitive damages in the United Kingdom, Canada and the Unit...
This paper questions the utility of courts continuing to award punitive damages. It argues that the...
A contemporary theory of punitive damages must answer two questions: (1) what place, if any, do puni...
The limitations on a punitive damage award depend on the conception of punitive damages. Is it a pri...
The practice of using punitive damages to punish a tort defendant, in a single case brought by a sin...
In light of increasing punitive damages awards, the United States Supreme Court formulated criteria ...
It has long been orthodoxy that punitive damages, because they are awarded in order to punish, are a...
Punitive damages and class actions can be viewed as sharing a common economic function – creating op...
This Article focuses on the concept that punitive damages can be justified as a substitute for compe...
Nineteenth-century debate on punitive damages has led to an apparently un- bridgeable gap between Am...
In 2001 the Supreme Court, in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., suggested that...
Following the recognition by the House of Lords in AG v Blake of the gain-based remedy of an account...