Add to ORKGIn 2004, after a long and difficult legislative process, the European Union adopted the Takeover Directive. 1 The final product was widely viewed as a failure. 2 For many it represented yet another example of how politics and interest groups interfere with the introduction of the regulation necessary for creating a level playing field in corporate law in the European Union; another example of how domestic politics gets in the way of advancing the overall economic interests of the Union and its Member States
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
Cross-border acquisitions, especially through hostile takeovers, represent one of the most dramatic ...
Whether the European Union's Takeover Directive should have adopted a mandatory neutrality rule has ...
In 2004, after a long and difficult legislative process, the European Union adopted the Takeover Di...
This paper argues that the failed attempt to introduce a mandatory board neutrality rule into EU tak...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the Board Neutrality Rule and the primac...
This paper contains the European Company Law Experts\u27 response to the report of the European Comm...
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeat...
Recent reports of the Commission and the European Parliament have revisited the concerns of protecti...
With the non-frustration rule (“NFR”) and the mandatory bid rule, the Takeover Bid Directive contain...
This article considers the significance of the UK Takeover Code's non-frustration prohibition. It as...
Analyses the implementation of the board neutrality rule contained in the EU Takeover Directive in a...
It is too early to make a complete judgment on the effectiveness of Directive 2004/25/EC on Takeover...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
Cross-border acquisitions, especially through hostile takeovers, represent one of the most dramatic ...
Whether the European Union's Takeover Directive should have adopted a mandatory neutrality rule has ...
In 2004, after a long and difficult legislative process, the European Union adopted the Takeover Di...
This paper argues that the failed attempt to introduce a mandatory board neutrality rule into EU tak...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the Board Neutrality Rule and the primac...
This paper contains the European Company Law Experts\u27 response to the report of the European Comm...
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeat...
Recent reports of the Commission and the European Parliament have revisited the concerns of protecti...
With the non-frustration rule (“NFR”) and the mandatory bid rule, the Takeover Bid Directive contain...
This article considers the significance of the UK Takeover Code's non-frustration prohibition. It as...
Analyses the implementation of the board neutrality rule contained in the EU Takeover Directive in a...
It is too early to make a complete judgment on the effectiveness of Directive 2004/25/EC on Takeover...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
Cross-border acquisitions, especially through hostile takeovers, represent one of the most dramatic ...