Analyses the implementation of the board neutrality rule contained in the EU Takeover Directive in all EU member states. Previously published as ECGI - Law Working paper No 141/2010
The removal of barriers to takeover activities has been the driving force behind the Directive since...
Cross-border acquisitions, especially through hostile takeovers, represent one of the most dramatic ...
The European Takeover Bids Directive has been at the centre of criticism since it was adopted on 21 ...
In 2004, after a long and difficult legislative process, the European Union adopted the Takeover Di...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
Whether the European Union's Takeover Directive should have adopted a mandatory neutrality rule has ...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
In April 21, 2004, after 20-year-long negotiations and debates, the Council of the European Union p...
In the article I analyse the more contentious part of the Directive, which provides for an extensive...
Global Merger and Acquisition activity reached record levels in 2006, with the US and EU playing a l...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
Since the implementation of the European Directive on Takeover Bids, a European common legal framewo...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the Board Neutrality Rule and the primac...
Since the implementation of the European Directive on Takeover Bids, a European common legal framewo...
This paper intends to highlight the regulatory direction concerning hostile takeover bids, along the...
The removal of barriers to takeover activities has been the driving force behind the Directive since...
Cross-border acquisitions, especially through hostile takeovers, represent one of the most dramatic ...
The European Takeover Bids Directive has been at the centre of criticism since it was adopted on 21 ...
In 2004, after a long and difficult legislative process, the European Union adopted the Takeover Di...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
Whether the European Union's Takeover Directive should have adopted a mandatory neutrality rule has ...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
In April 21, 2004, after 20-year-long negotiations and debates, the Council of the European Union p...
In the article I analyse the more contentious part of the Directive, which provides for an extensive...
Global Merger and Acquisition activity reached record levels in 2006, with the US and EU playing a l...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
Since the implementation of the European Directive on Takeover Bids, a European common legal framewo...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the Board Neutrality Rule and the primac...
Since the implementation of the European Directive on Takeover Bids, a European common legal framewo...
This paper intends to highlight the regulatory direction concerning hostile takeover bids, along the...
The removal of barriers to takeover activities has been the driving force behind the Directive since...
Cross-border acquisitions, especially through hostile takeovers, represent one of the most dramatic ...
The European Takeover Bids Directive has been at the centre of criticism since it was adopted on 21 ...
DOI
Add to ORKG