Sue-and-settle is the name applied to a federal agency’s use of litigation to create policy outside of the normal regulatory process. This paper discusses the impact that the sue-and-settle policy has had on Congress, the judiciary, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Specifically, this paper will discuss the issues caused by the perception of collusion within the sue-and-settle policy. First, this paper examines whether a relationship occurs between the litigants. The paper then discusses whether the relationship between the litigants in sue-and-settle cases tends to be collusive or not. The second part of the paper examines how Congress, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the judiciary are viewed because of the continued percep...
In an effort to strengthen private enforcement of federal law, Congress regularly employs plaintiff-...
Do lawyers facilitate dispute resolution or do they instead exacerbate conflict and pose a barrier t...
By a 5-4 vote in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court took yet anoth...
Sue-and-settle is the name applied to a federal agency’s use of litigation to create policy outside ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Are important regulatory decisions being made collusively and behind closed doors? A recent bill see...
Who should set regulatory agendas? Perhaps ideally well-qualified individuals appointed by the Presi...
Litigation is usually thought to signal a breakdown of social relationships. Game theorists predict,...
In the spring of 2013, industry groups and states began a concerted lobbying effort to oppose citize...
Can private individuals and organizations use so-called “sue and settle” lawsuits to set federal env...
This article reports data that contrast with an extended tradition of viewing litigation as incompat...
Congress regularly, and with increasing frequency, removes jurisdiction from the federal courts. Thi...
The classical story of regulatory takings litigation, which demands compensation under the Fifth Ame...
Over the last fifty years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found itself repeatedl...
Although Article I of the Constitution vests legislative power in the Congress, the lawmaking proces...
In an effort to strengthen private enforcement of federal law, Congress regularly employs plaintiff-...
Do lawyers facilitate dispute resolution or do they instead exacerbate conflict and pose a barrier t...
By a 5-4 vote in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court took yet anoth...
Sue-and-settle is the name applied to a federal agency’s use of litigation to create policy outside ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Are important regulatory decisions being made collusively and behind closed doors? A recent bill see...
Who should set regulatory agendas? Perhaps ideally well-qualified individuals appointed by the Presi...
Litigation is usually thought to signal a breakdown of social relationships. Game theorists predict,...
In the spring of 2013, industry groups and states began a concerted lobbying effort to oppose citize...
Can private individuals and organizations use so-called “sue and settle” lawsuits to set federal env...
This article reports data that contrast with an extended tradition of viewing litigation as incompat...
Congress regularly, and with increasing frequency, removes jurisdiction from the federal courts. Thi...
The classical story of regulatory takings litigation, which demands compensation under the Fifth Ame...
Over the last fifty years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has found itself repeatedl...
Although Article I of the Constitution vests legislative power in the Congress, the lawmaking proces...
In an effort to strengthen private enforcement of federal law, Congress regularly employs plaintiff-...
Do lawyers facilitate dispute resolution or do they instead exacerbate conflict and pose a barrier t...
By a 5-4 vote in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court took yet anoth...