When an American citizen is injured in a terrorist attack on foreign soil, the victim has a limited ability to sue a foreign state in the United States. Even more limited is the victim\u27s ability to execute a judgment against the foreign state. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act permits plaintiffs to execute a judgment against a foreign state only in limited and explicitly stated circumstances. In Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, the Seventh Circuit considered such a claim. The plaintiffs, seven American victims of a Hamas terrorist attack in Israel, sought to attach Iranian antiquities located in the Seventh Circuit in order to satisfy their $71.5 million judgment against Iran. The court rejected the plaintiff\u27s arguments, and ru...
Prior to the Supreme Court\u27s recent general personal jurisdiction decisions in Daimler AG v. Baum...
On January 19, 1981, the United States signed. an agreement with Iran that achieved the release of f...
If the aims of tort law are deterrence, compensation, and provision of equitable distribution of ris...
When an American citizen is injured in a terrorist attack on foreign soil, the victim has a limited ...
The case of Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran reads like a blockbuster movie with an all-star cast. ...
In 2016, family members of victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks sued Iran in the Southern D...
The United States Supreme Court should have expanded § 1610(g) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities A...
Since 1996, American victims of international terrorist acts supported by certain States designated...
This Article focuses on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act\u27s (FSIA) state-sponsored terrorism e...
The purpose of this note is to argue that cultural property should be immune from plaintiffs’ rights...
I. Introduction II. Background ... A. The Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act: State Sponsor of Terrorism...
For the nearly two years that Americans were held hostage in Teheran, United States courts presided ...
This Comment examines the history, development, and application of the FSIA’s terrorist state attach...
The Arab-Israeli conflict has been a testing ground for the involvement of U.S. courts in foreign co...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act contains a number of “exceptions” to state immunity that are un...
Prior to the Supreme Court\u27s recent general personal jurisdiction decisions in Daimler AG v. Baum...
On January 19, 1981, the United States signed. an agreement with Iran that achieved the release of f...
If the aims of tort law are deterrence, compensation, and provision of equitable distribution of ris...
When an American citizen is injured in a terrorist attack on foreign soil, the victim has a limited ...
The case of Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran reads like a blockbuster movie with an all-star cast. ...
In 2016, family members of victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks sued Iran in the Southern D...
The United States Supreme Court should have expanded § 1610(g) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities A...
Since 1996, American victims of international terrorist acts supported by certain States designated...
This Article focuses on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act\u27s (FSIA) state-sponsored terrorism e...
The purpose of this note is to argue that cultural property should be immune from plaintiffs’ rights...
I. Introduction II. Background ... A. The Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act: State Sponsor of Terrorism...
For the nearly two years that Americans were held hostage in Teheran, United States courts presided ...
This Comment examines the history, development, and application of the FSIA’s terrorist state attach...
The Arab-Israeli conflict has been a testing ground for the involvement of U.S. courts in foreign co...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act contains a number of “exceptions” to state immunity that are un...
Prior to the Supreme Court\u27s recent general personal jurisdiction decisions in Daimler AG v. Baum...
On January 19, 1981, the United States signed. an agreement with Iran that achieved the release of f...
If the aims of tort law are deterrence, compensation, and provision of equitable distribution of ris...