On January 19, 1981, the United States signed. an agreement with Iran that achieved the release of fifty-two American hostages held captive in Iran for over a year. In exchange for the safe return of the hostages, the United States returned Iranian property that had been seized in this country pursuant to a presidential order. The agreement, ending what one court termed a sorry chapter [in] the history of our country, \u27 required a controversial intrusion by the executive into federal court litigation. The Supreme Court sought to lay the controversy to rest in Dames & Moore v. Regan
In principle, the Reagan Administration should support measures that strengthen the international tr...
When a legal dispute involving a foreign nation is submitted to a United States court, the adjudicat...
During the 1960s and 1970s, the imperial government of the Shah of Iran encouraged foreign investmen...
On January 19, 1981, the United States signed. an agreement with Iran that achieved the release of f...
Executive Power--President Has the Power to Block and Transfer Iranian Assets, Nullify Prejudgment A...
The Iranian crisis created a laboratory in which to examine theforeign affairspowers of the branche...
A second look, however, reveals that in Dames & Moore, the Supreme Court did more than resolve some...
For the nearly two years that Americans were held hostage in Teheran, United States courts presided ...
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright recently made headlines by announcing that the United S...
On 1 July 1981, at the Peace Palace in The Hague, I had the privilege of declaring open the Iran-Uni...
Political as well as economic forces can lead governments to default on their obligations to foreign...
International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United Stat...
In 1981, the Supreme Court decided Dames & Moore v. Regan. According to the modest view of the major...
This is the twenty-fifth anniversary of what has become known as the Iranian Hostage Crisis. We shal...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act contains a number of “exceptions” to state immunity that are un...
In principle, the Reagan Administration should support measures that strengthen the international tr...
When a legal dispute involving a foreign nation is submitted to a United States court, the adjudicat...
During the 1960s and 1970s, the imperial government of the Shah of Iran encouraged foreign investmen...
On January 19, 1981, the United States signed. an agreement with Iran that achieved the release of f...
Executive Power--President Has the Power to Block and Transfer Iranian Assets, Nullify Prejudgment A...
The Iranian crisis created a laboratory in which to examine theforeign affairspowers of the branche...
A second look, however, reveals that in Dames & Moore, the Supreme Court did more than resolve some...
For the nearly two years that Americans were held hostage in Teheran, United States courts presided ...
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright recently made headlines by announcing that the United S...
On 1 July 1981, at the Peace Palace in The Hague, I had the privilege of declaring open the Iran-Uni...
Political as well as economic forces can lead governments to default on their obligations to foreign...
International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United Stat...
In 1981, the Supreme Court decided Dames & Moore v. Regan. According to the modest view of the major...
This is the twenty-fifth anniversary of what has become known as the Iranian Hostage Crisis. We shal...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act contains a number of “exceptions” to state immunity that are un...
In principle, the Reagan Administration should support measures that strengthen the international tr...
When a legal dispute involving a foreign nation is submitted to a United States court, the adjudicat...
During the 1960s and 1970s, the imperial government of the Shah of Iran encouraged foreign investmen...