Add to ORKGBook Review: The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary. By Michael J. Perry. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1982. Pp. xi, 241. Reviewed by Carl A. Auerbac
Book review: The Court and the Constitution. By Archibald Cox. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1987. Pp. 4...
Book review: Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution. By Sylvia Snowiss. New Haven, Conn.: Y...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. By John Agresto. Ithaca: Cornell Univer...
Book Review: The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Cons...
Book Review: The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Const...
A Review of The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Const...
Michael Perry believes that, in assessing the legitimacy of judicial review, one must distinguish sh...
Book review of "The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights" by Michael J. Perry. New Haven: Yale...
This book brings together two previously separate aspects of Michael J. Perry’s thoughtful and pione...
Never one to shirk a challenge, Michael Perry has taken on the difficult task of investigating wheth...
In this Essay, I explore, compare, and evaluate two theoretical models of judicial review in individ...
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constit...
The seemingly inexhaustible debate over the proper role of the Supreme Court in constitutional adjud...
Book review: Interpreting the Constitution: The Supreme Court and the Process of Adjudication. By H...
The Intelligible Constitution by Joseph Goldstein. Oxford University Press. 1992. The subtitle of Pr...
Book review: The Court and the Constitution. By Archibald Cox. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1987. Pp. 4...
Book review: Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution. By Sylvia Snowiss. New Haven, Conn.: Y...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. By John Agresto. Ithaca: Cornell Univer...
Book Review: The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Cons...
Book Review: The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Const...
A Review of The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Const...
Michael Perry believes that, in assessing the legitimacy of judicial review, one must distinguish sh...
Book review of "The Constitution, The Courts, and Human Rights" by Michael J. Perry. New Haven: Yale...
This book brings together two previously separate aspects of Michael J. Perry’s thoughtful and pione...
Never one to shirk a challenge, Michael Perry has taken on the difficult task of investigating wheth...
In this Essay, I explore, compare, and evaluate two theoretical models of judicial review in individ...
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constit...
The seemingly inexhaustible debate over the proper role of the Supreme Court in constitutional adjud...
Book review: Interpreting the Constitution: The Supreme Court and the Process of Adjudication. By H...
The Intelligible Constitution by Joseph Goldstein. Oxford University Press. 1992. The subtitle of Pr...
Book review: The Court and the Constitution. By Archibald Cox. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1987. Pp. 4...
Book review: Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution. By Sylvia Snowiss. New Haven, Conn.: Y...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. By John Agresto. Ithaca: Cornell Univer...