The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constitutional theory (Michael J. Perry, The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights (New Ha- ven: Yale University Press, 1982); Sotirios A. Barber, On What the Constitution Means (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984); and John Agresto, The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984). They explore important questions about the role of the Supreme Court and the meaning of the Constitution
Judicial supremacy is the new judicial review. From the time Alexander Bickel introduced the term c...
Our Symposium’s purpose is to examine the function of the Supreme Court and the conditions under whi...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constit...
We have come to an important crossroad in constitutional law. Academic commentators are calling for ...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. By John Agresto. Ithaca: Cornell Univer...
Many constitutional scholars are obsessed with judicial review and the many questions surrounding it...
The power of judicial review of federal statutes in American constitutional history has the mystique...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...
A Review of The Supreme Court: Trends and Developments, Volume 3: 1980-1981 by Jesse Choper, Yale ...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Judicial Choice: The Role of Provisional Review in a Democracy. B...
Most debate about the power of judicial review proceeds as if courts primarily invoke the Constituti...
Most debate about the power of judicial review proceeds as if courts primarily invoke the Constituti...
Judicial supremacy is the new judicial review. From the time Alexander Bickel introduced the term c...
Our Symposium’s purpose is to examine the function of the Supreme Court and the conditions under whi...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constit...
We have come to an important crossroad in constitutional law. Academic commentators are calling for ...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. By John Agresto. Ithaca: Cornell Univer...
Many constitutional scholars are obsessed with judicial review and the many questions surrounding it...
The power of judicial review of federal statutes in American constitutional history has the mystique...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...
A Review of The Supreme Court: Trends and Developments, Volume 3: 1980-1981 by Jesse Choper, Yale ...
Book review: The Supreme Court and Judicial Choice: The Role of Provisional Review in a Democracy. B...
Most debate about the power of judicial review proceeds as if courts primarily invoke the Constituti...
Most debate about the power of judicial review proceeds as if courts primarily invoke the Constituti...
Judicial supremacy is the new judicial review. From the time Alexander Bickel introduced the term c...
Our Symposium’s purpose is to examine the function of the Supreme Court and the conditions under whi...
The existence of judicial review confronts scholars of political institutions, particularly scholars...