This Note argues that the court in Allright improperly interpreted the statute\u27s requirement of a specific finding of blight for each parcel but it properly applied the predominance requirement. It also examines the impact of the new eminent domain legislation in Missouri and argues that the legislation does not provide as much protection to private property owners as the legislature claims
This Article examines the term blight and how it is used in eminent domain cases. Part I discusse...
In 1952, the District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency (DCRLA) announced a sweeping plan to cle...
The Supreme Court reaffirms its decision in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222 (1956...
This Note argues that the court in Allright improperly interpreted the statute\u27s requirement of a...
Eminent domain has been a hot topic in legal circles since the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s opinion in Ke...
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
This Article advocates that courts should distinguish between typical land use regulation and should...
In perhaps no area of the law are the rules more contradictory, confusing and difficult to retain th...
Since the Supreme Court approved of economic growth as a proper public use to support the exercise o...
This note will discuss the plight of abutting landowners, and explore various legal theories that ma...
This Article argues that the holding of the Western District contravenes decades of Missouri statuto...
Defendant city instituted a comprehensive urban redevelopment plan under which condemnation and purc...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
This note discusses the issues raised by the policy of seizing land through eminent domain by saying...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
This Article examines the term blight and how it is used in eminent domain cases. Part I discusse...
In 1952, the District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency (DCRLA) announced a sweeping plan to cle...
The Supreme Court reaffirms its decision in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222 (1956...
This Note argues that the court in Allright improperly interpreted the statute\u27s requirement of a...
Eminent domain has been a hot topic in legal circles since the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s opinion in Ke...
The controversial ruling in the case of Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut was an impetus for a...
This Article advocates that courts should distinguish between typical land use regulation and should...
In perhaps no area of the law are the rules more contradictory, confusing and difficult to retain th...
Since the Supreme Court approved of economic growth as a proper public use to support the exercise o...
This note will discuss the plight of abutting landowners, and explore various legal theories that ma...
This Article argues that the holding of the Western District contravenes decades of Missouri statuto...
Defendant city instituted a comprehensive urban redevelopment plan under which condemnation and purc...
In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of eminent domain takings that benefit ...
This note discusses the issues raised by the policy of seizing land through eminent domain by saying...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
This Article examines the term blight and how it is used in eminent domain cases. Part I discusse...
In 1952, the District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency (DCRLA) announced a sweeping plan to cle...
The Supreme Court reaffirms its decision in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222 (1956...