Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court reaffirms its decision in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222 (1956) and holds that the government may disregard the value of land arising from the fact of riparian location in compensating the owner when fast lands are appropriated. United States v. Rands, 88 S. Ct. 265 (1967)
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
In eminent domain proceedings where the state or a repository of state power seeks to use land withi...
The purpose of the requirement of just compensation contained in the United States Constitution, whe...
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
Defendant\u27s land, situated between the riverside and set-back levees of the proposed floodway ext...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that when an easement has been ambiguously granted, the grantee ...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...
In 2021 the United States Supreme Court decided in the case PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey that...
In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court, in United States v. Rands, expanded the navigational servitude doct...
This Article advocates that courts should distinguish between typical land use regulation and should...
The Wandermere Corporation owned one mile of frontage along an open-access highway. The state planne...
The eminent domain clause of the U.S. Constitution concerns the limits of the government\u27s right ...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
I. The Nature and Scope of the Eminent Domain Power … A. Introduction … B. Sources of Eminent Domain...
The United States Supreme Court held that in order to survive a takings challenge, a development exa...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
In eminent domain proceedings where the state or a repository of state power seeks to use land withi...
The purpose of the requirement of just compensation contained in the United States Constitution, whe...
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
Defendant\u27s land, situated between the riverside and set-back levees of the proposed floodway ext...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that when an easement has been ambiguously granted, the grantee ...
Governments, both state and federal, have the right to take private property for public use, provide...
In 2021 the United States Supreme Court decided in the case PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey that...
In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court, in United States v. Rands, expanded the navigational servitude doct...
This Article advocates that courts should distinguish between typical land use regulation and should...
The Wandermere Corporation owned one mile of frontage along an open-access highway. The state planne...
The eminent domain clause of the U.S. Constitution concerns the limits of the government\u27s right ...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
I. The Nature and Scope of the Eminent Domain Power … A. Introduction … B. Sources of Eminent Domain...
The United States Supreme Court held that in order to survive a takings challenge, a development exa...
On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the now infamous case of Kelo...
In eminent domain proceedings where the state or a repository of state power seeks to use land withi...
The purpose of the requirement of just compensation contained in the United States Constitution, whe...