Add to ORKGSupreme Court cases on diversity could only assist if they defined diversity in a way that allowed institutions to admit significant numbers of the type of individuals that the institutions were lacking. This is precisely what the Supreme Court\u27s cases on diversity do not do. Furthermore, the Supreme Court\u27s view of diversity is flawed because it does not address existing power differentials between Blacks and Whites. As a result diversity, as it is defined by the Supreme Court, is a dead-end for those who are concerned about social justice and equity in higher education
Racism has been embedded in American society since its founding. The systemic nature of racism means...
In several cases addressing the constitutionality of affirmative action admissions policies, the Sup...
The value of diversity in the workplace, classroom, and c-suite is universally proclaimed as a given...
The concept of diversity undermines the true spirit of any affirmative action policy, which is to re...
In this article, Professor David Orentlicher argues that following the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s affir...
For the past 40 years, the constitutionality of affirmative action has rested on a central idea: rac...
For four decades, the diversity rationale has offered a lifeline to affirmative action in higher edu...
Race matters, but judges and courts have failed to fashion a rule of law that is inclusive of all ra...
How is diversity measured? When is diversity sufficient? The Supreme Court has pressed these hard qu...
Student body diversity-and the purported educational benefits diversity bestows- is the final Suprem...
This Note argues that if courts choose to reexamine evidence on the value of diversity in higher edu...
Though diversity remains a compelling state interest, recent rulings like Ricci v. DeStefano and Par...
Ideologies are most successful (or most dangerous) when they become common-sense—when they become wi...
As has been the case with respect to many political and social institutions in American society, div...
Twice in the past two years, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved educational diversity as a compelli...
Racism has been embedded in American society since its founding. The systemic nature of racism means...
In several cases addressing the constitutionality of affirmative action admissions policies, the Sup...
The value of diversity in the workplace, classroom, and c-suite is universally proclaimed as a given...
The concept of diversity undermines the true spirit of any affirmative action policy, which is to re...
In this article, Professor David Orentlicher argues that following the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s affir...
For the past 40 years, the constitutionality of affirmative action has rested on a central idea: rac...
For four decades, the diversity rationale has offered a lifeline to affirmative action in higher edu...
Race matters, but judges and courts have failed to fashion a rule of law that is inclusive of all ra...
How is diversity measured? When is diversity sufficient? The Supreme Court has pressed these hard qu...
Student body diversity-and the purported educational benefits diversity bestows- is the final Suprem...
This Note argues that if courts choose to reexamine evidence on the value of diversity in higher edu...
Though diversity remains a compelling state interest, recent rulings like Ricci v. DeStefano and Par...
Ideologies are most successful (or most dangerous) when they become common-sense—when they become wi...
As has been the case with respect to many political and social institutions in American society, div...
Twice in the past two years, the U.S. Supreme Court has approved educational diversity as a compelli...
Racism has been embedded in American society since its founding. The systemic nature of racism means...
In several cases addressing the constitutionality of affirmative action admissions policies, the Sup...
The value of diversity in the workplace, classroom, and c-suite is universally proclaimed as a given...