Add to ORKGThe US Supreme Court first reviewed a state\u27s statutory procedure for juvenile transfer to adult criminal courts in Kent v. US 1 Morris Kent was a fourteen-year-old first convicted for purse snatching and house-breaking, placed on probation, and later charged at the age of sixteen with robbery and rape. 2 Kent was arrested, presumably admitted to involvement in these crimes after seven hours of interrogation, and placed in a receiving home for one week
In the 1980s and 1990s, nearly every state enacted legislative changes that eased the process of tre...
The adult criminal justice system is worse for juveniles who commit crimes. Underlying principles up...
This article traces the evolution of the youth justice system in Canada and the United States and ex...
The US Supreme Court first reviewed a state\u27s statutory procedure for juvenile transfer to adult ...
Rising juvenile crime rates during the 1970s and 1980s spurred state legislatures across the country...
In the great majority of states all persons who have not reached their 16th birthday are within the ...
Kent v. United States was the first in a series of majority decisions by the United States Supreme C...
This Comment begins with an introduction to the history and purpose of the juvenile justice system, ...
The number of juveniles transferred to adult court has skyrocketed in the past two decades and has o...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
There is no federal juvenile court system in the United States. Rather, teens can face charges in Ar...
The adult criminal justice system is worse for juveniles who commit crimes. Underlying principles up...
In the past two decades, nearly every state has expanded its authority and simplified its procedures...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
This Article makes valuable new contributions to the burgeoning scholarly discourse on Apprendi v. N...
In the 1980s and 1990s, nearly every state enacted legislative changes that eased the process of tre...
The adult criminal justice system is worse for juveniles who commit crimes. Underlying principles up...
This article traces the evolution of the youth justice system in Canada and the United States and ex...
The US Supreme Court first reviewed a state\u27s statutory procedure for juvenile transfer to adult ...
Rising juvenile crime rates during the 1970s and 1980s spurred state legislatures across the country...
In the great majority of states all persons who have not reached their 16th birthday are within the ...
Kent v. United States was the first in a series of majority decisions by the United States Supreme C...
This Comment begins with an introduction to the history and purpose of the juvenile justice system, ...
The number of juveniles transferred to adult court has skyrocketed in the past two decades and has o...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
There is no federal juvenile court system in the United States. Rather, teens can face charges in Ar...
The adult criminal justice system is worse for juveniles who commit crimes. Underlying principles up...
In the past two decades, nearly every state has expanded its authority and simplified its procedures...
Kent v. United States required trial courts to conduct an individualized assessment before transferr...
This Article makes valuable new contributions to the burgeoning scholarly discourse on Apprendi v. N...
In the 1980s and 1990s, nearly every state enacted legislative changes that eased the process of tre...
The adult criminal justice system is worse for juveniles who commit crimes. Underlying principles up...
This article traces the evolution of the youth justice system in Canada and the United States and ex...