Add to ORKGTo argue that the adjudicated child is not punished as the adult offender but is provided care, protection, and treatment is to make a distinction without a difference. The sanctions employed by the children\u27s court are essentially the same as those the criminal court uses: principally, probation and institutional commitments
When the child and the state confront each other in the juvenile justice system, no amount of benevo...
Twenty-first century juvenile justice jurisprudence has focused on the criminal responsibility of ad...
In the typical juvenile delinquency case, a child is arrested by a policeman for the alleged commiss...
The thesis of this paper can be stated simply: to the extent that courts permit procedural (or subst...
Throughout much of its history, the American juvenile court maintained a goal of rehabilitation of t...
There is a general consensus that when children are accused of committing criminal offenses, the mai...
This Article attempts to provide an analytical framework for identifying the punitive aspects of the...
The object of this Article is to show that there is no inherent inconsistency between the juvenile c...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
Underlying the juvenile court system are two competing philosophies of justice which have taken pred...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
An inability to reconcile society\u27s need for protection from juvenile crime with the use of nonpu...
The present juvenile court system has proven ineffective in dealing with status offenders. This No...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s decision In re Gault 1 transformed the juvenile court into a ve...
The concept of amenability to treatment is, in theory, at the core of juvenile delinquency jurisprud...
When the child and the state confront each other in the juvenile justice system, no amount of benevo...
Twenty-first century juvenile justice jurisprudence has focused on the criminal responsibility of ad...
In the typical juvenile delinquency case, a child is arrested by a policeman for the alleged commiss...
The thesis of this paper can be stated simply: to the extent that courts permit procedural (or subst...
Throughout much of its history, the American juvenile court maintained a goal of rehabilitation of t...
There is a general consensus that when children are accused of committing criminal offenses, the mai...
This Article attempts to provide an analytical framework for identifying the punitive aspects of the...
The object of this Article is to show that there is no inherent inconsistency between the juvenile c...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
Underlying the juvenile court system are two competing philosophies of justice which have taken pred...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
An inability to reconcile society\u27s need for protection from juvenile crime with the use of nonpu...
The present juvenile court system has proven ineffective in dealing with status offenders. This No...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s decision In re Gault 1 transformed the juvenile court into a ve...
The concept of amenability to treatment is, in theory, at the core of juvenile delinquency jurisprud...
When the child and the state confront each other in the juvenile justice system, no amount of benevo...
Twenty-first century juvenile justice jurisprudence has focused on the criminal responsibility of ad...
In the typical juvenile delinquency case, a child is arrested by a policeman for the alleged commiss...