Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court\u27s decision In re Gault 1 transformed the juvenile court into a very different institution than that envisioned by its Progressive creators. 2 Judicial and legislative efforts to harmonize the juvenile court with Gault\u27s constitutional mandate have modified the purpose, process, and operation of the juvenile justice system. The Progressives envisioned a procedurally informal court with individualized, offender-oriented dispositional practices. The Supreme Court\u27s due process decisions impose procedural formality on the juvenile court\u27s traditional, individualized-treatment sentencing schemes. As the juvenile court system deviates from the Progressive ideal, it increasingly resembles, both procedura...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
To argue that the adjudicated child is not punished as the adult offender but is provided care, pr...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
The 1967 United States Supreme Court decision In re Gault 1 precipitated a procedural revolution tha...
Underlying the juvenile court system are two competing philosophies of justice which have taken pred...
Throughout much of its history, the American juvenile court maintained a goal of rehabilitation of t...
The juvenile court system should be abolished and all juvenile offenders should be integrated into t...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
This Article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Gault...
The Juvenile Court system was conceived and established at the turn of the century, although belated...
This Article attempts to provide an analytical framework for identifying the punitive aspects of the...
The thesis of this paper can be stated simply: to the extent that courts permit procedural (or subst...
Part I briefly analyzes the social history of the juvenile court and argues that the progressive ref...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
To argue that the adjudicated child is not punished as the adult offender but is provided care, pr...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
The 1967 United States Supreme Court decision In re Gault 1 precipitated a procedural revolution tha...
Underlying the juvenile court system are two competing philosophies of justice which have taken pred...
Throughout much of its history, the American juvenile court maintained a goal of rehabilitation of t...
The juvenile court system should be abolished and all juvenile offenders should be integrated into t...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
This Article challenges the accepted wisdom, at least since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Gault...
The Juvenile Court system was conceived and established at the turn of the century, although belated...
This Article attempts to provide an analytical framework for identifying the punitive aspects of the...
The thesis of this paper can be stated simply: to the extent that courts permit procedural (or subst...
Part I briefly analyzes the social history of the juvenile court and argues that the progressive ref...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
To argue that the adjudicated child is not punished as the adult offender but is provided care, pr...