In this dialogue, I have tried to address criticisms of the substantive criminal law, as a course and as a subject matter, made by a number of my students over several decades of teaching the subject. In away it is rather personal since it consists of the criticisms of my students and my apologia for what I have tried to do. That, however, would hardly be worth doing unless it is the case, as I believe it is, that these criticisms are widespread and that my responses speak to what is generally done in criminal law courses in this country
Criminal law, for much of the nineteenth century and part of the twentieth, was at the forefront of ...
Criminal law scholarship is marked by a sharp fault line separating substantive criminal law from cr...
The last several decades have witnessed an outpouring of serious articles bringing to bear the metho...
In this dialogue, I have tried to address criticisms of the substantive criminal law, as a course an...
In a recent critique, Jens Ohlin faults contemporary criminal law textbooks for emphasizing philosop...
I thoroughly enjoy every course in my teaching package, but the first-year Criminal Law course occup...
This Advanced Introduction to Substantive Criminal Law explores the doctrines, issues and controvers...
Recent turmoil in the marketplace has led to a massive attorney layoffs and the folding of several m...
Criminal law is a nasty business. The field takes as its point of departure the indignities that hum...
Article suggests that learning about criminal statutes should be incorporated into teaching criminal...
What distinguishes “criminal law” from all other law? This question should be central to both crimin...
It is hoped that this symposium will be stimulating and provocative. In devoting an entire issue to ...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
A report on the September 2014 CEPLER Workshop, which brought together representatives of higher edu...
Whether from the media or the seemingly endless rotation of Law and Order episodes, many students en...
Criminal law, for much of the nineteenth century and part of the twentieth, was at the forefront of ...
Criminal law scholarship is marked by a sharp fault line separating substantive criminal law from cr...
The last several decades have witnessed an outpouring of serious articles bringing to bear the metho...
In this dialogue, I have tried to address criticisms of the substantive criminal law, as a course an...
In a recent critique, Jens Ohlin faults contemporary criminal law textbooks for emphasizing philosop...
I thoroughly enjoy every course in my teaching package, but the first-year Criminal Law course occup...
This Advanced Introduction to Substantive Criminal Law explores the doctrines, issues and controvers...
Recent turmoil in the marketplace has led to a massive attorney layoffs and the folding of several m...
Criminal law is a nasty business. The field takes as its point of departure the indignities that hum...
Article suggests that learning about criminal statutes should be incorporated into teaching criminal...
What distinguishes “criminal law” from all other law? This question should be central to both crimin...
It is hoped that this symposium will be stimulating and provocative. In devoting an entire issue to ...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
A report on the September 2014 CEPLER Workshop, which brought together representatives of higher edu...
Whether from the media or the seemingly endless rotation of Law and Order episodes, many students en...
Criminal law, for much of the nineteenth century and part of the twentieth, was at the forefront of ...
Criminal law scholarship is marked by a sharp fault line separating substantive criminal law from cr...
The last several decades have witnessed an outpouring of serious articles bringing to bear the metho...