The rules of civil procedure, seemingly straightforward, can be misinterpreted due to attorney inattentiveness. One rule which has suffered and still is suffering from misinterpretation and misapplication is Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure 54(B), judgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple parties, the subject of this note. The following discussion, an analysis of Rule 54(B), will attempt to accomplish several tasks. First, the note will briefly describe the history, nature, and purpose of the rule. Secondly, it will analyze the major aspects and requirements of Rule 54(B). The analysis will emphasize the facets of the rule which have often been misconstrued and explain the proper interpretations where they exist. Third, the note will...
The revolution is here! It has come quietly, almost without a murmur of opposition or civil discord....
The plaintiff now contends that it is the State\u27s responsibility to respond to its first set of e...
This article will provide an in depth analysis of Rule 3(A). The analysis is divided into four secti...
The rules of civil procedure, seemingly straightforward, can be misinterpreted due to attorney inatt...
Civil procedure has been much improved and greatly simplified as compared with by-gone days. However...
As we commemorate the diamond anniversary of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Article take...
In the vast majority of cases, the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure will be the primary source of autho...
Ohio\u27s Civ. R. 49(B) permits parties to submit interrogatories to the jury in order to test the j...
Revised Code § 2317.48 was designed to enable a plaintiff to obtain information necessary to the dra...
The Supreme Court of Ohio recently completed revision of its Rules of Practice. They became effectiv...
The Judicial Conference of the United States is charged by statute to carry on a continuous study o...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
On March 4, 1980, the Ohio General Assembly finally concurred on an amended form of Senate Bill 165,...
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the...
It might be well to begin by giving consideration to the recent cases dealing with appellate procedu...
The revolution is here! It has come quietly, almost without a murmur of opposition or civil discord....
The plaintiff now contends that it is the State\u27s responsibility to respond to its first set of e...
This article will provide an in depth analysis of Rule 3(A). The analysis is divided into four secti...
The rules of civil procedure, seemingly straightforward, can be misinterpreted due to attorney inatt...
Civil procedure has been much improved and greatly simplified as compared with by-gone days. However...
As we commemorate the diamond anniversary of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Article take...
In the vast majority of cases, the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure will be the primary source of autho...
Ohio\u27s Civ. R. 49(B) permits parties to submit interrogatories to the jury in order to test the j...
Revised Code § 2317.48 was designed to enable a plaintiff to obtain information necessary to the dra...
The Supreme Court of Ohio recently completed revision of its Rules of Practice. They became effectiv...
The Judicial Conference of the United States is charged by statute to carry on a continuous study o...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
On March 4, 1980, the Ohio General Assembly finally concurred on an amended form of Senate Bill 165,...
The Ohio Supreme Court has twice promulgated and the Ohio General Assembly has twice disapproved the...
It might be well to begin by giving consideration to the recent cases dealing with appellate procedu...
The revolution is here! It has come quietly, almost without a murmur of opposition or civil discord....
The plaintiff now contends that it is the State\u27s responsibility to respond to its first set of e...
This article will provide an in depth analysis of Rule 3(A). The analysis is divided into four secti...