To what extent does the law of armed conflict (LOAC) apply to the United States military fighting in armed conflicts? Though the question seems straightforward enough, the answer is anything but. This article explains, in general, why the answer is imprecise and unsatisfying as applied to the most prevalent type of contemporary armed conflict, non-international. More specifically, this article argues that the U.S. government\u27s primary response of claiming to apply LOAC as a matter of policy when and where that law wouldn\u27t otherwise apply is superficially persuasive but not substantively responsive
The various international treaties governing armed conflicts – the main Hague Conventions from 1907,...
In this Article, I will describe the three questions I ask and highlight some of the practical probl...
Confronting significant foreign policy questions, US international lawyers persistently frame their ...
To what extent does the law of armed conflict (LOAC) apply to the United States military fighting in...
The law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts ...
Few areas of international law are as consequential as the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC). At its very...
The current bifurcated conflict classification paradigm for applying the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC...
Transnational armed conflicts have become a reality. The increasing sophistication of terrorist orga...
For more than fifty years following the 1949 revision of the Geneva Conventions, legal scholars, gov...
Both international and domestic law take as a basic premise the notion that it is possible, importan...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
The U.S. military response to the 9/11 attacks has expanded into a “global war” without a definite g...
The past decades have seen an increasing amount of intra-State wars unfold. The term ‘terrorism’ has...
In reflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan, three key issues r...
Air and missile warfare is and will almost certainly continue to be a ubiquitous aspect of contempor...
The various international treaties governing armed conflicts – the main Hague Conventions from 1907,...
In this Article, I will describe the three questions I ask and highlight some of the practical probl...
Confronting significant foreign policy questions, US international lawyers persistently frame their ...
To what extent does the law of armed conflict (LOAC) apply to the United States military fighting in...
The law of armed conflict has often been described as outdated and ill suited to military conflicts ...
Few areas of international law are as consequential as the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC). At its very...
The current bifurcated conflict classification paradigm for applying the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC...
Transnational armed conflicts have become a reality. The increasing sophistication of terrorist orga...
For more than fifty years following the 1949 revision of the Geneva Conventions, legal scholars, gov...
Both international and domestic law take as a basic premise the notion that it is possible, importan...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
The U.S. military response to the 9/11 attacks has expanded into a “global war” without a definite g...
The past decades have seen an increasing amount of intra-State wars unfold. The term ‘terrorism’ has...
In reflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan, three key issues r...
Air and missile warfare is and will almost certainly continue to be a ubiquitous aspect of contempor...
The various international treaties governing armed conflicts – the main Hague Conventions from 1907,...
In this Article, I will describe the three questions I ask and highlight some of the practical probl...
Confronting significant foreign policy questions, US international lawyers persistently frame their ...