The Inter-American Court was unanimous in concluding that legal entities do not have the standing to directly access the Inter-American system in a contentious process as presumptive victims. Corporations therefore will not be permitted to access the Court as victims of human rights transgressions, which the Court determined is limited to human beings, with two exceptions: trade unions and indigenous communities. Trade unions have standing as victims of human rights violations on their behalf and that of their members, but under certain limitations. This commentary focuses on the Court’s decision with regard to trade unions, but begins with a description of the heart of the decision limiting the access of other legal entities
International human rights law is generally thought to apply directly to states, not to corporations...
National courts often face many obstacles in enforcing human rights law in the private sphere. There...
[Excerpt] On September 18, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a United States base...
The Inter-American Court was unanimous in concluding that legal entities do not have the standing to...
On 26 February 2016, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued a decision recognizing the spec...
When analyzing the contentious jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ...
In Advisory Opinion OC-18 of September 17, 2003, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that...
This article presents an analysis of the way that profit-making corporations have sought human right...
Contrary to the claims of some observers, the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain...
The article addresses the vexing problem of holding corporations liable for assisting in the soverei...
A number of recent, important contributions to the literature of supranational judicial institution ...
The article examines the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in several areas ...
American law schools use appellate court decisions to teach the implementation and progression of th...
In this paper, Dr. Reed explores issues of corporate civil liability for human rights violations. Th...
Why do courts rely on specific bodies of jurisprudence to justify decisions? We analyze judicial dia...
International human rights law is generally thought to apply directly to states, not to corporations...
National courts often face many obstacles in enforcing human rights law in the private sphere. There...
[Excerpt] On September 18, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a United States base...
The Inter-American Court was unanimous in concluding that legal entities do not have the standing to...
On 26 February 2016, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued a decision recognizing the spec...
When analyzing the contentious jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ...
In Advisory Opinion OC-18 of September 17, 2003, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that...
This article presents an analysis of the way that profit-making corporations have sought human right...
Contrary to the claims of some observers, the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain...
The article addresses the vexing problem of holding corporations liable for assisting in the soverei...
A number of recent, important contributions to the literature of supranational judicial institution ...
The article examines the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in several areas ...
American law schools use appellate court decisions to teach the implementation and progression of th...
In this paper, Dr. Reed explores issues of corporate civil liability for human rights violations. Th...
Why do courts rely on specific bodies of jurisprudence to justify decisions? We analyze judicial dia...
International human rights law is generally thought to apply directly to states, not to corporations...
National courts often face many obstacles in enforcing human rights law in the private sphere. There...
[Excerpt] On September 18, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a United States base...