A laboratory experiment designed to investigate the role of relative performance-based payoffs on cooperation in the context of punishment. Subjects play a repeated public goods game with high-powered punishment (50:1) and additional payoffs based on relative performance. Contributions to the public good are nearly maximal. Punishment levels are substantial, higher than the same game without relative rank payoffs, and sufficiently high that total payoffs are negative. The group would make much more money in the same setting without punishment. This study contributes to investigation of the role of altruism in human cooperation
Both group competition and altruistic punishment have been put forward as explanations for sustained...
A number of studies have shown that peer punishment can sustain cooperation in public good games. Th...
Working paper GATE 2010-19 ; CIRANO Scientific Publication 2011s-08 ; IZA Discussion paper 5206Exper...
A laboratory experiment where human subjects play a repeated public goods game with high-powered pun...
We report data from public goods games showing that privately-implemented punishment reduces coopera...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Humans often cooperate, voluntarily paying an individual cost to supply a benefit to others. Public ...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher’s own expe...
International audienceThis paper reports the results of an experiment that investigates the relation...
Abstract we experimentally investigate whether third-party punishment is more effective than second-...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher's own expe...
This work focuses on costly punishment imposed by unaffected observing third parties in economic exp...
The threat of punishment usually promotes cooperation. However, punishing itself is costly, rare in ...
In this experimental study we analyse three collective and one individual punishment rule in a publi...
Costly punishment can facilitate cooperation in public-goods games, as human subjects will incur cos...
Both group competition and altruistic punishment have been put forward as explanations for sustained...
A number of studies have shown that peer punishment can sustain cooperation in public good games. Th...
Working paper GATE 2010-19 ; CIRANO Scientific Publication 2011s-08 ; IZA Discussion paper 5206Exper...
A laboratory experiment where human subjects play a repeated public goods game with high-powered pun...
We report data from public goods games showing that privately-implemented punishment reduces coopera...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Humans often cooperate, voluntarily paying an individual cost to supply a benefit to others. Public ...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher’s own expe...
International audienceThis paper reports the results of an experiment that investigates the relation...
Abstract we experimentally investigate whether third-party punishment is more effective than second-...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher's own expe...
This work focuses on costly punishment imposed by unaffected observing third parties in economic exp...
The threat of punishment usually promotes cooperation. However, punishing itself is costly, rare in ...
In this experimental study we analyse three collective and one individual punishment rule in a publi...
Costly punishment can facilitate cooperation in public-goods games, as human subjects will incur cos...
Both group competition and altruistic punishment have been put forward as explanations for sustained...
A number of studies have shown that peer punishment can sustain cooperation in public good games. Th...
Working paper GATE 2010-19 ; CIRANO Scientific Publication 2011s-08 ; IZA Discussion paper 5206Exper...