Two principles distinguish experimental economic science from other experimental social sciences. First, we experimental economists pay our participants based upon the decisions they make… Secondly, we do not use deception, not out of any deontic aversion to dishonesty, but rather because we are “concerned about developing and maintaining a reputation among the student population for honesty in order to ensure that subject actions are motivated by the induced monetary rewards rather than by psychological reactions to suspected manipulation” (Davis and Holt, 1993, pp. 23‐24).1 Again, our concern is for the integrity of the inferences from our observations
Lying to participants offers an experimenter the enticing prospect of making “others' behaviour” a c...
A neglected critique of social science laboratories alleges that they implement phenomena different ...
Critics of deception in research allege harm to society, the discipline of psychology, the researche...
Two principles distinguish experimental economic science from other experimental social sciences. Fi...
Experimental economists believe (and enforce) that researchers should not employ deception in the de...
Several leading experimental economists have independently proposed that deception should be proscri...
Recently, it has been argued that the evidence in social science research suggests that deceiving pa...
Recently, it has been argued that the evidence in social science research suggests that deceiving su...
Recently, it has been argued that the evidence in social science research suggests that deceiving pa...
A taboo on the deception of participants is a defining characteristic of experimen-tal economics. Ex...
The use of deception in research is divisive along disciplinary lines. Whereas psychologists argue t...
Abstract Like avoiding labor protection law via foreign subcontractors, banning deception in economi...
Experiments have become a well-established methodological tool in economics. e development of experi...
This thesis investigates preferences for honesty in economic experiments. Preferences for honesty ha...
Is the rapid growth of experimental research in economics evidence of a new scientific spirit at wor...
Lying to participants offers an experimenter the enticing prospect of making “others' behaviour” a c...
A neglected critique of social science laboratories alleges that they implement phenomena different ...
Critics of deception in research allege harm to society, the discipline of psychology, the researche...
Two principles distinguish experimental economic science from other experimental social sciences. Fi...
Experimental economists believe (and enforce) that researchers should not employ deception in the de...
Several leading experimental economists have independently proposed that deception should be proscri...
Recently, it has been argued that the evidence in social science research suggests that deceiving pa...
Recently, it has been argued that the evidence in social science research suggests that deceiving su...
Recently, it has been argued that the evidence in social science research suggests that deceiving pa...
A taboo on the deception of participants is a defining characteristic of experimen-tal economics. Ex...
The use of deception in research is divisive along disciplinary lines. Whereas psychologists argue t...
Abstract Like avoiding labor protection law via foreign subcontractors, banning deception in economi...
Experiments have become a well-established methodological tool in economics. e development of experi...
This thesis investigates preferences for honesty in economic experiments. Preferences for honesty ha...
Is the rapid growth of experimental research in economics evidence of a new scientific spirit at wor...
Lying to participants offers an experimenter the enticing prospect of making “others' behaviour” a c...
A neglected critique of social science laboratories alleges that they implement phenomena different ...
Critics of deception in research allege harm to society, the discipline of psychology, the researche...