The Congressional power to establish and regulate the mails is derived from article I, section 8, clause 7 of the Constitution which states simply that Congress shall have the power To establish Post Offices and post Roads. More than one thousand postal inspectors are employed to enforce the wide spectrum of laws, which have been enacted under this grant of power to assure the smooth and sage distribution of the mail. Through an analysis of legislative history, case history, and recent opinions of the Supreme Court, the writers will endeavor to support the proposition that private correspondence between consenting parties, whether obscene or not, is outside to scope of the obscenity statute
Declares state policy is to prohibit obscene matter and conduct. Redefines obscene and knowingly ...
Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor R...
One of the most important cases before the courts was decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the...
The Congressional power to establish and regulate the mails is derived from article I, section 8, cl...
For nearly one hundred years the federal government has had as one of its functions the suppression ...
This report discusses parts of the U.S. Criminal Code, provisions of the Postal Reorganization Act o...
Congressional Record - Introduction of a Bill Relating to Obscenity Control in the Mail
A Review of Federal Censorship: Obscenity in the Mail. By James C. N. Paul and Murray L. Schwartz
Over their long history, the mail and wire fraud statutes have gone through repeated periods of rapi...
Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving t...
Since at least the late 1800s, the United States government has regularly tracked the mail of many o...
Near the end of the 1970-71 term, the Supreme Court considered two cases, United States v. Reidell a...
The federal crime of mail fraud is generally viewed as the original federal auxiliary jurisdiction c...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...
Mr. Hart Warns That Authority for Issuance of a Fraud Order Should Be Made to Stand Rigid Tests as t...
Declares state policy is to prohibit obscene matter and conduct. Redefines obscene and knowingly ...
Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor R...
One of the most important cases before the courts was decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the...
The Congressional power to establish and regulate the mails is derived from article I, section 8, cl...
For nearly one hundred years the federal government has had as one of its functions the suppression ...
This report discusses parts of the U.S. Criminal Code, provisions of the Postal Reorganization Act o...
Congressional Record - Introduction of a Bill Relating to Obscenity Control in the Mail
A Review of Federal Censorship: Obscenity in the Mail. By James C. N. Paul and Murray L. Schwartz
Over their long history, the mail and wire fraud statutes have gone through repeated periods of rapi...
Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving t...
Since at least the late 1800s, the United States government has regularly tracked the mail of many o...
Near the end of the 1970-71 term, the Supreme Court considered two cases, United States v. Reidell a...
The federal crime of mail fraud is generally viewed as the original federal auxiliary jurisdiction c...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...
Mr. Hart Warns That Authority for Issuance of a Fraud Order Should Be Made to Stand Rigid Tests as t...
Declares state policy is to prohibit obscene matter and conduct. Redefines obscene and knowingly ...
Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor R...
One of the most important cases before the courts was decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the...