The fifth and most recent session of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sa (UNCLOS) was, as were previous sessions, unable to produce a solution to the deadlock over deep seabed mining. The tentative steps toward accommodation developed during the fourth UNCLOS session were brushed aside, and polarization again characterized the proceedings. As a result of this stalemate, strong pressure will grow within the United States Congress to abstain from further international negotiations and instead to esbalish a domestic regulatory system for deep-seabed mining
The United States is committed as a matter of national policy to enter into negotiations with all co...
This Article examines the conditions creating a need for, and the procedures being implemented to ac...
The legal regime governing the recovery of deep seabed minerals may be the most difficult issue now ...
The eighth session of the United Nations Law of the Sea Conference convened recently in Geneva, Swit...
The United States and some of its major allies have been negotiating for some time concerning the es...
In this Article, the author argues that UNCLOS III is a fatally flawed document that is inimical to ...
This Comment critiques the United States\u27 refusal to sign the Convention, based on its contention...
For most of the last decade, the longest and largest United Nations Conference in history has negoti...
In opposition to Professor Laylin, this Article questions whether the United States should take unil...
The author reviews negotiations at The Law of the Sea Conference, offering his views as to the sourc...
This Comment analyzes the composition and decision-making procedures of the proposed International S...
In June of 1980, the President of the United States signed into law the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Res...
This presentation and panel discussion are part of the symposium entitled: Mining the Deep Seabed: A...
Presently, no international law exists to limit recovering mineral sources of the seabed beyond coas...
The author looks at coastal and other state interests competing in the united States\u27 policy for ...
The United States is committed as a matter of national policy to enter into negotiations with all co...
This Article examines the conditions creating a need for, and the procedures being implemented to ac...
The legal regime governing the recovery of deep seabed minerals may be the most difficult issue now ...
The eighth session of the United Nations Law of the Sea Conference convened recently in Geneva, Swit...
The United States and some of its major allies have been negotiating for some time concerning the es...
In this Article, the author argues that UNCLOS III is a fatally flawed document that is inimical to ...
This Comment critiques the United States\u27 refusal to sign the Convention, based on its contention...
For most of the last decade, the longest and largest United Nations Conference in history has negoti...
In opposition to Professor Laylin, this Article questions whether the United States should take unil...
The author reviews negotiations at The Law of the Sea Conference, offering his views as to the sourc...
This Comment analyzes the composition and decision-making procedures of the proposed International S...
In June of 1980, the President of the United States signed into law the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Res...
This presentation and panel discussion are part of the symposium entitled: Mining the Deep Seabed: A...
Presently, no international law exists to limit recovering mineral sources of the seabed beyond coas...
The author looks at coastal and other state interests competing in the united States\u27 policy for ...
The United States is committed as a matter of national policy to enter into negotiations with all co...
This Article examines the conditions creating a need for, and the procedures being implemented to ac...
The legal regime governing the recovery of deep seabed minerals may be the most difficult issue now ...