In this Article, the author argues that UNCLOS III is a fatally flawed document that is inimical to the interests of the United States. He argues that the proposed seabed provisions violate philosophical, as well as practical interests, and legitimizes principles that would have an adverse impact on future international negotiations. The author proposes several amendments to the Draft Convention, and argues that only a treaty which recognizes that free market seabed mining and commercial exchange exploit no one will increase the prospects for free exchange, free trade, economic prosperity, and even world peace
In this foreword, the writing claims that the major dimensions of the United Nations Conference on t...
This Comment analyzes the composition and decision-making procedures of the proposed International S...
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a major achievement of diplomac...
In this Article, the author examines the position of the United States towards the Convention and th...
The eighth session of the United Nations Law of the Sea Conference convened recently in Geneva, Swit...
The fifth and most recent session of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sa (UNCLOS) was...
The author reviews negotiations at The Law of the Sea Conference, offering his views as to the sourc...
This Comment critiques the United States\u27 refusal to sign the Convention, based on its contention...
The issue of whether or not the U.S. should ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the S...
The author looks at coastal and other state interests competing in the united States\u27 policy for ...
This Article examines the potential obstacles that must be overcome before the creation of a global ...
In this Article, the author analyzes the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The a...
The paper begins by briefly surveying the extent to which the convention’s provisions intersect with...
UNCLOS III has provided LLS with a unique forum to express their need for enforceable rights to shar...
In opposition to Professor Laylin, this Article questions whether the United States should take unil...
In this foreword, the writing claims that the major dimensions of the United Nations Conference on t...
This Comment analyzes the composition and decision-making procedures of the proposed International S...
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a major achievement of diplomac...
In this Article, the author examines the position of the United States towards the Convention and th...
The eighth session of the United Nations Law of the Sea Conference convened recently in Geneva, Swit...
The fifth and most recent session of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sa (UNCLOS) was...
The author reviews negotiations at The Law of the Sea Conference, offering his views as to the sourc...
This Comment critiques the United States\u27 refusal to sign the Convention, based on its contention...
The issue of whether or not the U.S. should ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the S...
The author looks at coastal and other state interests competing in the united States\u27 policy for ...
This Article examines the potential obstacles that must be overcome before the creation of a global ...
In this Article, the author analyzes the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The a...
The paper begins by briefly surveying the extent to which the convention’s provisions intersect with...
UNCLOS III has provided LLS with a unique forum to express their need for enforceable rights to shar...
In opposition to Professor Laylin, this Article questions whether the United States should take unil...
In this foreword, the writing claims that the major dimensions of the United Nations Conference on t...
This Comment analyzes the composition and decision-making procedures of the proposed International S...
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a major achievement of diplomac...