Add to ORKGForward to the Symposium on the Admission of Prior Offense Evidence in Sexual Assualt Cases, Chicago, Illinois, 1994
In sexual assault cases, the ability to distinguish myths and stereotypes from legitimate lines of r...
The classic study of the American jury shows that when a defendant\u27s criminal record is known and...
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the disse...
When claims of sexual misconduct are made, two threads are often seen in the kinds of questions rais...
In virtually every jurisdiction in the United States, the law of evidence prohibits parties from off...
In a significant break with traditional evidence rules and policies, Federal Rules of Evidence 413-4...
Prosecuting sex crimes is a sensitive, challenging process, and many who commit these crimes end up ...
This Article makes two main contributions to existing literature. First, it asserts that in deciding...
This article is a discussion of the instances when criminal acts of the accused, occurring both prio...
Part I of this Article traces the development of the civil application of Rule 412, the so-called “R...
This article analyzes the theories cited by defendants, and occasionally prosecutors, to admit evide...
In recent decades, few matters have split the Supreme Court, troubled the legal profession, and agit...
Examining what went wrong in the first 250 DNA exonerations was a sobering occupation, and I describ...
It is not the intention of the author to concentrate on generalizations in this article, but an intr...
The need for pretrial discovery in criminal cases is critical. A defendant\u27s right to confrontat...
In sexual assault cases, the ability to distinguish myths and stereotypes from legitimate lines of r...
The classic study of the American jury shows that when a defendant\u27s criminal record is known and...
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the disse...
When claims of sexual misconduct are made, two threads are often seen in the kinds of questions rais...
In virtually every jurisdiction in the United States, the law of evidence prohibits parties from off...
In a significant break with traditional evidence rules and policies, Federal Rules of Evidence 413-4...
Prosecuting sex crimes is a sensitive, challenging process, and many who commit these crimes end up ...
This Article makes two main contributions to existing literature. First, it asserts that in deciding...
This article is a discussion of the instances when criminal acts of the accused, occurring both prio...
Part I of this Article traces the development of the civil application of Rule 412, the so-called “R...
This article analyzes the theories cited by defendants, and occasionally prosecutors, to admit evide...
In recent decades, few matters have split the Supreme Court, troubled the legal profession, and agit...
Examining what went wrong in the first 250 DNA exonerations was a sobering occupation, and I describ...
It is not the intention of the author to concentrate on generalizations in this article, but an intr...
The need for pretrial discovery in criminal cases is critical. A defendant\u27s right to confrontat...
In sexual assault cases, the ability to distinguish myths and stereotypes from legitimate lines of r...
The classic study of the American jury shows that when a defendant\u27s criminal record is known and...
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the disse...