Add to ORKGIt is not the intention of the author to concentrate on generalizations in this article, but an introductory comment of a general character on this topic seems unavoidable. Assume that D is on trial for the rape of his fourteen-year-old daughter. He elects not to take the witness stand, claiming this right under the Fifth Amendment. (a) Could W, an older daughter, testify that D raped her several times when she was fourteen years old? (b) Could the prosecutor introduce evidence of a conviction of D for raping W when she was fourteen years old-i.e., would the foregoing offer of proof be admissible for any purpose? Obviously, more facts may be needed depending upon the circumstances of a particular case, but these will be added; meanwhile, th...
Although its theoretical basis may be disputed, nobody questions the proposition that a person charg...
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule provides that a criminal defendant may suppress the fruits of...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...
The cases dealing with admissibility of prior criminal acts are narrowly decided. Indeed, the result...
This Article isolates only two of the many aspects of the Court\u27s labors affecting the acquisitio...
In virtually every jurisdiction in the United States, the law of evidence prohibits parties from off...
This Article makes two main contributions to existing literature. First, it asserts that in deciding...
This article criticises H.L. Ho’s argument that the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence can be...
This article considers the propriety of an indictment of a person who was subpoenaed to testify befo...
Professor Gershman\u27s Article notes that courts and lawmakers have changed procedural and evidenti...
This article is a discussion of the instances when criminal acts of the accused, occurring both prio...
In this article, Professor Arnold H. Loewy distinguishes between substantive Constitutional rights a...
Modem American law is, in a sense, a system of compartments. For understandable curricular reasons, ...
American system places these constraints on the age old criminal law question: “WHODUNIT?” This arti...
This Article will explore why these types of confessions, called self-inculpatory statements, should...
Although its theoretical basis may be disputed, nobody questions the proposition that a person charg...
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule provides that a criminal defendant may suppress the fruits of...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...
The cases dealing with admissibility of prior criminal acts are narrowly decided. Indeed, the result...
This Article isolates only two of the many aspects of the Court\u27s labors affecting the acquisitio...
In virtually every jurisdiction in the United States, the law of evidence prohibits parties from off...
This Article makes two main contributions to existing literature. First, it asserts that in deciding...
This article criticises H.L. Ho’s argument that the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence can be...
This article considers the propriety of an indictment of a person who was subpoenaed to testify befo...
Professor Gershman\u27s Article notes that courts and lawmakers have changed procedural and evidenti...
This article is a discussion of the instances when criminal acts of the accused, occurring both prio...
In this article, Professor Arnold H. Loewy distinguishes between substantive Constitutional rights a...
Modem American law is, in a sense, a system of compartments. For understandable curricular reasons, ...
American system places these constraints on the age old criminal law question: “WHODUNIT?” This arti...
This Article will explore why these types of confessions, called self-inculpatory statements, should...
Although its theoretical basis may be disputed, nobody questions the proposition that a person charg...
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule provides that a criminal defendant may suppress the fruits of...
Courts of last resort now seldom reverse a ruling on the competency of witnesses.\u27 Convinced, and...