This is the publisher's version, also available electronically from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381331?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.No abstract is available for this item
Epicurus wrote that death cannot be bad for a person who dies, since when someone dies they no longe...
This essay will defend Epicurus’ (341 – 270 BCE) view that death is not a harm to us
James Stacey Taylor is an Epicurean who argues that death cannot be bad for the person who dies. He ...
This is the publisher's version, also available electronically from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381...
The most popular philosophical account of how death can harm (or be bad for) the deceased is the dep...
If death is a harm then it is a harm that cannot be experienced. The proponent of death's harm must ...
This thesis offers an analysis of the possible harm of death, posing three questions: Who is the su...
According to Epicurus (1966a,b), neither death, nor anything that occurs later, can harm those who d...
What is harm? I offer an account that involves the victim’s either suffering some adverse intrinsic ...
Epicurus (in)famously argued that death is not harmful and therefore our standard reactions to it (l...
In his recent book, Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics (Routeledge 2012), James Stacey Taylor cha...
Death generally seems bad for those who have died. Is it? If so, what makes it bad? In this disserta...
Deprivationists think death can be good or bad for the deceased. One popular version of deprivationi...
In a chapter from his book, "Confrontation with the Reaper," Feldman critiques Epicurus' assertion t...
There is a Japanese expression "whipping the dead." This derives from a historical event in China. W...
Epicurus wrote that death cannot be bad for a person who dies, since when someone dies they no longe...
This essay will defend Epicurus’ (341 – 270 BCE) view that death is not a harm to us
James Stacey Taylor is an Epicurean who argues that death cannot be bad for the person who dies. He ...
This is the publisher's version, also available electronically from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381...
The most popular philosophical account of how death can harm (or be bad for) the deceased is the dep...
If death is a harm then it is a harm that cannot be experienced. The proponent of death's harm must ...
This thesis offers an analysis of the possible harm of death, posing three questions: Who is the su...
According to Epicurus (1966a,b), neither death, nor anything that occurs later, can harm those who d...
What is harm? I offer an account that involves the victim’s either suffering some adverse intrinsic ...
Epicurus (in)famously argued that death is not harmful and therefore our standard reactions to it (l...
In his recent book, Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics (Routeledge 2012), James Stacey Taylor cha...
Death generally seems bad for those who have died. Is it? If so, what makes it bad? In this disserta...
Deprivationists think death can be good or bad for the deceased. One popular version of deprivationi...
In a chapter from his book, "Confrontation with the Reaper," Feldman critiques Epicurus' assertion t...
There is a Japanese expression "whipping the dead." This derives from a historical event in China. W...
Epicurus wrote that death cannot be bad for a person who dies, since when someone dies they no longe...
This essay will defend Epicurus’ (341 – 270 BCE) view that death is not a harm to us
James Stacey Taylor is an Epicurean who argues that death cannot be bad for the person who dies. He ...
DOI
Add to ORKG