Recent years have seen a series of new species descriptions in which no type specimen or fragmentary type specimen material was provided as documentation. These descriptions have been controversial, but the Code of Zoological Nomenclature makes clear that such nondiagnostic types are not acceptable specimen documentation. A more appropriate approach is documentation of the discovery, but without formal naming of the species, until suitable specimen documentation can be assembled
For more than a century, scientific describers of new species of animals and plants have designated ...
Scientific debate over identification of taxa below the species level has persisted for centuries. T...
The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) depos...
Recent years have seen a series of new species descriptions in which no type specimen or fragmentary...
The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) depos...
132 p. ; 26 cm.Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-127) and index.This sixth part of "Type s...
For more than a century, scientific describers of new species of animals and plants have designated ...
Scientific debate over identification of taxa below the species level has persisted for centuries. T...
The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) depos...
Recent years have seen a series of new species descriptions in which no type specimen or fragmentary...
The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) depos...
132 p. ; 26 cm.Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-127) and index.This sixth part of "Type s...
For more than a century, scientific describers of new species of animals and plants have designated ...
Scientific debate over identification of taxa below the species level has persisted for centuries. T...
The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) depos...