Kansas is the only state in the union that gives the members of its bar majority control over the selection of state supreme court justices. The bar consequently may have more control over the judiciary in Kansas than in any other state. This process for selecting justices to the Kansas Supreme Court is described by the organized bar as a "merit," rather than political, process. Other observers, however, emphasize that the process has a political side as well. This paper surveys debate about possible reforms to the Kansas Supreme Court selection process. These reforms would reduce the amount of control exercised by the bar and establish a more public system of checks and balances
Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections...
The subject of the selection of state court judges has many aspects, including the choice of the sel...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...
Kansas is the only state in the union that gives the members of its bar majority control over the se...
In supreme court selection, the bar has more power in Kansas than in any other state. This extraordi...
According to Justice Steven Breyer, the reputation and the reality of the fairness and effectivenes...
We should distinguish the process that initially selects a judge from the process that determines wh...
The Missouri Law Review\u27s title for this symposium rightly recognizes the distinction between jud...
The article aims to introduce the selection of systems used throughout the United States of America ...
The Alaska legislature is considering a bill — Senate Joint Resolution 3 — that would put before vot...
Judicial selection for state courts in the United States has become a controversial subject in Ameri...
Delegates to Alaska\u27s Constitutional Convention adopted a Judiciary Article that called for the s...
The scholarly debate about how to select state judges has been ongoing for decades; the public debat...
The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute is pleased to publish this paper from Dr. Stephen L. Wasby wh...
Attempts to improve the integrity of the judiciary have focused on the proper method of selecting ju...
Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections...
The subject of the selection of state court judges has many aspects, including the choice of the sel...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...
Kansas is the only state in the union that gives the members of its bar majority control over the se...
In supreme court selection, the bar has more power in Kansas than in any other state. This extraordi...
According to Justice Steven Breyer, the reputation and the reality of the fairness and effectivenes...
We should distinguish the process that initially selects a judge from the process that determines wh...
The Missouri Law Review\u27s title for this symposium rightly recognizes the distinction between jud...
The article aims to introduce the selection of systems used throughout the United States of America ...
The Alaska legislature is considering a bill — Senate Joint Resolution 3 — that would put before vot...
Judicial selection for state courts in the United States has become a controversial subject in Ameri...
Delegates to Alaska\u27s Constitutional Convention adopted a Judiciary Article that called for the s...
The scholarly debate about how to select state judges has been ongoing for decades; the public debat...
The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute is pleased to publish this paper from Dr. Stephen L. Wasby wh...
Attempts to improve the integrity of the judiciary have focused on the proper method of selecting ju...
Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections...
The subject of the selection of state court judges has many aspects, including the choice of the sel...
The judicial selection and retention provisions of the Alaska Constitution, found in Article IV, ach...