This study examines the performance of 93 fund managers over the 10 year period 1986 through 1995 using relative percentile ranks based on quarterly compounded, annual total returns measured against funds with the same investment objective. On average, managers with 10-year track records at the same fund do not perform better than managers with shorter track records. Also, for these experienced managers, superior performance in one five-year period is not predictive of superior performance over the next five years. However, inferior performance persists, particularly for funds with above average expense ratios
This study provides evidence that merit—specifically, performance relative to peers measured on a st...
This study provides evidence that merit—specifically, performance relative to peers measured on a st...
The relative performance of no-load, growth-oriented mutual funds persists in the near term, with th...
This study examines the performance of 93 fund managers over the 10 year period 1986 through 1995 us...
This study examines the performance of 93 fund managers over the 10 year period 1986 through 1995 us...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80years to identify the best mut...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80years to identify the best mut...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80years to identify the best mut...
This study examines the performance of mutual fund managers using a newly constructed database that ...
The authors explore performance persistence in mutual funds using absolute and relative benchmarks. ...
Apparently “there is no substitute for experience”. This and similar phrases are often heard in the ...
This study provides evidence that merit—specifically, performance relative to peers measured on a st...
This study provides evidence that merit—specifically, performance relative to peers measured on a st...
The relative performance of no-load, growth-oriented mutual funds persists in the near term, with th...
This study examines the performance of 93 fund managers over the 10 year period 1986 through 1995 us...
This study examines the performance of 93 fund managers over the 10 year period 1986 through 1995 us...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80 years to identify the best mu...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80years to identify the best mut...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80years to identify the best mut...
This study uses a survivorship-bias free dataset spanning more than 80years to identify the best mut...
This study examines the performance of mutual fund managers using a newly constructed database that ...
The authors explore performance persistence in mutual funds using absolute and relative benchmarks. ...
Apparently “there is no substitute for experience”. This and similar phrases are often heard in the ...
This study provides evidence that merit—specifically, performance relative to peers measured on a st...
This study provides evidence that merit—specifically, performance relative to peers measured on a st...
The relative performance of no-load, growth-oriented mutual funds persists in the near term, with th...