We develop a model of Tiebout sorting based on decentralized income taxation, which allows for spillovers and imperfect rivalry in consumption of the publicly provided good. We identify three sources of welfare loss from decentralization: Imperfect redistribution, inter-jurisdictional free-riding, and inecient residential choice. Whereas the welfare loss from imperfect redistribution decreases and that from free-riding rises unambiguously as the publicly provided good becomes more pure, the welfare loss from the inecient residential choice depends non-monotonically on spillovers and rivalry. The equilibrium can be characterized by relative crowding of either the rich or the poor municipality. Our results imply that the characteristics of th...
We model the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making over the provision of l...
We revisit the Tiebout hypothesis in a world in which agents may learn extra information as to how t...
While competition among companies tends to be beneficial for the general public, this is not necessa...
We develop a model of Tiebout sorting based on decentralized income taxation, which allows for spill...
We develop a model of Tiebout sorting based on decentralized income taxation, which allows for spill...
Income and property taxation are among the most prevalent policy instruments to finance local expend...
This paper explores a question that lies at the intersection of two vast literatures. The goal is to...
The literature has been inconclusive regarding the welfare effects of fiscal decentralization (FD), ...
Despite long-standing theoretical interest, empirical attempts at investigating the appropriate leve...
Charles Tiebout’s (1956) suggestion that people “vote with their feet ” to find the commu-nity that ...
In this paper, we revisit the classical trade-off between centralized and decentralized provision o...
When local public goods are provided by a centralized authority, spillovers are internalized, but he...
Abstract. We examine theoretically and quantitatively the welfare effects of decentralized (Tiebout)...
We revisit the Tiebout hypothesis in a world in which agents may learn extra information as to how t...
The aim of the paper is to analyze a simple model of local public good provision with positive inter...
We model the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making over the provision of l...
We revisit the Tiebout hypothesis in a world in which agents may learn extra information as to how t...
While competition among companies tends to be beneficial for the general public, this is not necessa...
We develop a model of Tiebout sorting based on decentralized income taxation, which allows for spill...
We develop a model of Tiebout sorting based on decentralized income taxation, which allows for spill...
Income and property taxation are among the most prevalent policy instruments to finance local expend...
This paper explores a question that lies at the intersection of two vast literatures. The goal is to...
The literature has been inconclusive regarding the welfare effects of fiscal decentralization (FD), ...
Despite long-standing theoretical interest, empirical attempts at investigating the appropriate leve...
Charles Tiebout’s (1956) suggestion that people “vote with their feet ” to find the commu-nity that ...
In this paper, we revisit the classical trade-off between centralized and decentralized provision o...
When local public goods are provided by a centralized authority, spillovers are internalized, but he...
Abstract. We examine theoretically and quantitatively the welfare effects of decentralized (Tiebout)...
We revisit the Tiebout hypothesis in a world in which agents may learn extra information as to how t...
The aim of the paper is to analyze a simple model of local public good provision with positive inter...
We model the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making over the provision of l...
We revisit the Tiebout hypothesis in a world in which agents may learn extra information as to how t...
While competition among companies tends to be beneficial for the general public, this is not necessa...