‘We don’t torture’, announced both Bush and Obama. But what Bush meant as a statement of fact, Obama meant as a statement of resolve. Exploring this example, this article examines how moral resolutions work to overcome the rationalisations that temptation engenders. This in turn sheds light on the the nature of our moral concepts. Resolutions are typically framed using intentional notions (torture, murder, theft). Reflection on the reasons for this provides a new perspective on what is right, and what is wrong, about the doctrine of double effect
The United States has historically been regarded as a moral leader opening the pathway for human rig...
The Contingency of Moral Personhood challenges conceptions of the person on which moral personhood i...
Contemporary moral philosophy, political theory, and jurisprudence have converged to create a quite ...
The treatment of prisoners during the Bush years is a stain on the moral standing of the US which th...
American legal discourse on torture takes for granted some, usually all, of the following propositio...
Revelations of ill-treatment of prisoners by American forces at Abu Ghraib and the publication of m...
The doctrine of double effect (DDE) explains that it may be permissible to cause harm as a foreseen ...
This article explores some of the moral language of oppression, especially as it rests on a distinc-...
In its standard formulation, the doctrine of double effect (DDE) permits an action that causes fores...
Almost every serious commentator to address the moral and legal question of torture has taken for gr...
This chapter considers the wider significance of torture, addressing the manner in which it represen...
When the state punishes a person, it treats him as it ordinarily should not. It takes away his prope...
Despite the ever-growing number of exonerations in the U.S.— and the corresponding surge in scholarl...
The practices of using hostages to obtain concessions and using human shields to deter aggression sh...
Abstract. To understand the problem of torture in a democratic society, we have to take up a politic...
The United States has historically been regarded as a moral leader opening the pathway for human rig...
The Contingency of Moral Personhood challenges conceptions of the person on which moral personhood i...
Contemporary moral philosophy, political theory, and jurisprudence have converged to create a quite ...
The treatment of prisoners during the Bush years is a stain on the moral standing of the US which th...
American legal discourse on torture takes for granted some, usually all, of the following propositio...
Revelations of ill-treatment of prisoners by American forces at Abu Ghraib and the publication of m...
The doctrine of double effect (DDE) explains that it may be permissible to cause harm as a foreseen ...
This article explores some of the moral language of oppression, especially as it rests on a distinc-...
In its standard formulation, the doctrine of double effect (DDE) permits an action that causes fores...
Almost every serious commentator to address the moral and legal question of torture has taken for gr...
This chapter considers the wider significance of torture, addressing the manner in which it represen...
When the state punishes a person, it treats him as it ordinarily should not. It takes away his prope...
Despite the ever-growing number of exonerations in the U.S.— and the corresponding surge in scholarl...
The practices of using hostages to obtain concessions and using human shields to deter aggression sh...
Abstract. To understand the problem of torture in a democratic society, we have to take up a politic...
The United States has historically been regarded as a moral leader opening the pathway for human rig...
The Contingency of Moral Personhood challenges conceptions of the person on which moral personhood i...
Contemporary moral philosophy, political theory, and jurisprudence have converged to create a quite ...