Figure S3. Fine-mapping and sequence comparison of qGP1(Gn1a): a, the qGP1 was mapped between to Block244; b, the annotated genes inBlock244; and c, the sequence difference of Gn1a between SN265 and R99. (PDF 103 kb
Table S3. Detailed information of the conserved GWAS sites over the two years (2014 and 2015). QTL_1...
Figure S3. Graphical representation of allelic patterns in the two fucosyltransferase. Substitution ...
Table S1. Eleven traits of Nipponbare, PA64s and 9311 observed in Shengzhen (SZ) and Hangzhou (HZ). ...
Figure S4. Sequence comparison of PHYB, SD1, DTH8, SDG708, and GW5 between SN265 and R99. (PDF 47Â k...
Figure S1. Graphic representation of the genotypes of 151 RILs that were identified using a sliding ...
Table S6. The QTL analysis for 15 agronomic traits in the three areas. (XLSX 12Â kb
Figure S7. The influence of ecological conditions and genetic background on gene function. The upper...
Figure S2. Collinearity between the bin map derived from the RIL population and the reference genome...
Figure S5. Candidate gene prediction of grain shape regulate locus on chromosome 12. (PDF 23Â kb
Figure S6. The effects of DTH8, SDG708, and PHYB in different areas: a, the heading date of the diff...
Table S5. The yield components and quality traits of japonica, intermediate type and indica-type pla...
Figure S8. The heading time of RILs in the three areas: a, the heading data of RILs and the day leng...
Figure S5. Comparisons of heading date, grain number per panicle and plant height among different ha...
Figure S4. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis and Sequence variations of predicted genes. A-C.RN...
Figure S2. Sequence difference and phenotypic variations on four reported genes. A. Difference sites...
Table S3. Detailed information of the conserved GWAS sites over the two years (2014 and 2015). QTL_1...
Figure S3. Graphical representation of allelic patterns in the two fucosyltransferase. Substitution ...
Table S1. Eleven traits of Nipponbare, PA64s and 9311 observed in Shengzhen (SZ) and Hangzhou (HZ). ...
Figure S4. Sequence comparison of PHYB, SD1, DTH8, SDG708, and GW5 between SN265 and R99. (PDF 47Â k...
Figure S1. Graphic representation of the genotypes of 151 RILs that were identified using a sliding ...
Table S6. The QTL analysis for 15 agronomic traits in the three areas. (XLSX 12Â kb
Figure S7. The influence of ecological conditions and genetic background on gene function. The upper...
Figure S2. Collinearity between the bin map derived from the RIL population and the reference genome...
Figure S5. Candidate gene prediction of grain shape regulate locus on chromosome 12. (PDF 23Â kb
Figure S6. The effects of DTH8, SDG708, and PHYB in different areas: a, the heading date of the diff...
Table S5. The yield components and quality traits of japonica, intermediate type and indica-type pla...
Figure S8. The heading time of RILs in the three areas: a, the heading data of RILs and the day leng...
Figure S5. Comparisons of heading date, grain number per panicle and plant height among different ha...
Figure S4. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis and Sequence variations of predicted genes. A-C.RN...
Figure S2. Sequence difference and phenotypic variations on four reported genes. A. Difference sites...
Table S3. Detailed information of the conserved GWAS sites over the two years (2014 and 2015). QTL_1...
Figure S3. Graphical representation of allelic patterns in the two fucosyltransferase. Substitution ...
Table S1. Eleven traits of Nipponbare, PA64s and 9311 observed in Shengzhen (SZ) and Hangzhou (HZ). ...