The shaded regions show the weighted 95% percentile interval from the composite predictions of all three models of the timelines required to cross the WHO 1% elimination threshold for all five scenarios. The black dots indicate upper and lower bounds (weighted 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) of the composite predictions from all three models for each scenario. The range of predictions is tightest when the models were constrained with data from scenarios 3 and 4.</p
<p>Median dates, mean dates, and 95% credibility intervals for individual chronograms are given in <...
<p>The top 5% threshold of FST values for all comparisons in simulations under different demographic...
<p>Probability of elimination assuming no new cases are observed: WPV1 (A), WPV3 (C), cVDPV2 (E). Pr...
Model predictions of timelines to achieve 1% mf prevalence and corresponding information metrics.</p
The boxplots show that by calibrating the models to data streams, more precise predictions are able ...
<p>The numbers in square brackets indicate when the multi-model ensemble mean crosses the 2°C thresh...
This visual comparison shows that the predictions coming from the model-only simulations (scenario 0...
<p>Each color represents one 25OHD category, as indicated. Models (black) and 95% confidence bounds ...
Ensemble of predictions of daily confirmed cases, and probability of elimination over time, assuming...
<p>Panel A shows the proportion of predictions collapsed across all years. Panels B and C shows stac...
Model predictions for participants choosing the predicted information compared to the alternative in...
<p>A) Frequency distribution of zero emission year. Bars indicate the percentage of the CMIP5 simula...
Ensemble of predictions of daily confirmed cases, and probability of elimination over time, assuming...
<p>For increasing classification thresholds percentages of correct classifications were compared to ...
<p>Model predictions for the CCCMA climate predictions are very similar to those shown here. (C) sho...
<p>Median dates, mean dates, and 95% credibility intervals for individual chronograms are given in <...
<p>The top 5% threshold of FST values for all comparisons in simulations under different demographic...
<p>Probability of elimination assuming no new cases are observed: WPV1 (A), WPV3 (C), cVDPV2 (E). Pr...
Model predictions of timelines to achieve 1% mf prevalence and corresponding information metrics.</p
The boxplots show that by calibrating the models to data streams, more precise predictions are able ...
<p>The numbers in square brackets indicate when the multi-model ensemble mean crosses the 2°C thresh...
This visual comparison shows that the predictions coming from the model-only simulations (scenario 0...
<p>Each color represents one 25OHD category, as indicated. Models (black) and 95% confidence bounds ...
Ensemble of predictions of daily confirmed cases, and probability of elimination over time, assuming...
<p>Panel A shows the proportion of predictions collapsed across all years. Panels B and C shows stac...
Model predictions for participants choosing the predicted information compared to the alternative in...
<p>A) Frequency distribution of zero emission year. Bars indicate the percentage of the CMIP5 simula...
Ensemble of predictions of daily confirmed cases, and probability of elimination over time, assuming...
<p>For increasing classification thresholds percentages of correct classifications were compared to ...
<p>Model predictions for the CCCMA climate predictions are very similar to those shown here. (C) sho...
<p>Median dates, mean dates, and 95% credibility intervals for individual chronograms are given in <...
<p>The top 5% threshold of FST values for all comparisons in simulations under different demographic...
<p>Probability of elimination assuming no new cases are observed: WPV1 (A), WPV3 (C), cVDPV2 (E). Pr...