Table S1. TPR, FPR and FDR in variable selection with 50 replications (Weibull distribution). Table S2. TPR, FPR and FDR in variable selection with 50 replications (Gamma distribution). Table S3. Computational time (minutes) for application in simulation trials. Table S4. The estimated effects of 14 SNPs by SurvEMVS and classical Weibull regression. Table S5. Demographic and clinical characteristics of STAD patients. Table S6. The estimated effects of gene expression levels selected by SurvEMVS and Cox LASSO with their counterparts in low dimension scenario (i.e., Weibull regession and Cox model, respectively). Figure S1. Pseudocode for implementation of SurvEMVS. Figure S2. Averaged estimated effect (black vertical lines) for each marker o...
Tables A13-A16. Impact of α0 and ω on the operating characteristics for scenarios S25 to S32 when th...
The KaplanâMeier estimator using top 35 mutated genes. The KaplanâMeier curves using 35 mutated ...
List of 1655 genes with a negative jGRP statistic meaning a down-regulation in LUAD tissues relative...
Figure A2. Subgroup of OS2006 historical data (SARC-OS data). Observed Kaplan-Meier and parametric e...
Annotation for seven CpG sites selected by SIS. Table S2 Cox regression analysis of clinical charact...
Figure A3. Historical datasets considered in the simulation study. Observed Kaplan-Meier curves of S...
Table S1. Results from the stepwise variable selection method using multivariable mixture cure model...
Additional file 1: Supplement Fig. 1. Survival curves for patients with different risk score accordi...
Cox model DRFS analyses including intrinsic subtype in all patients from the MDACC-based cohort (GSE...
The 270 geneSIMMS biomarkers that outperformed the single-gene AURKA model in all twelve meta-datase...
The P-value of the Cox univariate regression analysis using different gene sets. (A) The P-values of...
Figure S1. UPGMA dendrogram comparing the seven prediction scores for breast cancer (Panel A) and lu...
Figure A4-A6. Graphical representation of scenarios S1 to S32. Graphical representations of scenario...
Supplementary Figures and Tables. This file contains the following figures and tables: Validation of...
Multivariate analysis including Estrogen and Her2 receptor status. This additional file comprises 3 ...
Tables A13-A16. Impact of α0 and ω on the operating characteristics for scenarios S25 to S32 when th...
The KaplanâMeier estimator using top 35 mutated genes. The KaplanâMeier curves using 35 mutated ...
List of 1655 genes with a negative jGRP statistic meaning a down-regulation in LUAD tissues relative...
Figure A2. Subgroup of OS2006 historical data (SARC-OS data). Observed Kaplan-Meier and parametric e...
Annotation for seven CpG sites selected by SIS. Table S2 Cox regression analysis of clinical charact...
Figure A3. Historical datasets considered in the simulation study. Observed Kaplan-Meier curves of S...
Table S1. Results from the stepwise variable selection method using multivariable mixture cure model...
Additional file 1: Supplement Fig. 1. Survival curves for patients with different risk score accordi...
Cox model DRFS analyses including intrinsic subtype in all patients from the MDACC-based cohort (GSE...
The 270 geneSIMMS biomarkers that outperformed the single-gene AURKA model in all twelve meta-datase...
The P-value of the Cox univariate regression analysis using different gene sets. (A) The P-values of...
Figure S1. UPGMA dendrogram comparing the seven prediction scores for breast cancer (Panel A) and lu...
Figure A4-A6. Graphical representation of scenarios S1 to S32. Graphical representations of scenario...
Supplementary Figures and Tables. This file contains the following figures and tables: Validation of...
Multivariate analysis including Estrogen and Her2 receptor status. This additional file comprises 3 ...
Tables A13-A16. Impact of α0 and ω on the operating characteristics for scenarios S25 to S32 when th...
The KaplanâMeier estimator using top 35 mutated genes. The KaplanâMeier curves using 35 mutated ...
List of 1655 genes with a negative jGRP statistic meaning a down-regulation in LUAD tissues relative...