Most of the patients experienced an improving trend in clinical symptoms within 9 months after the first treatment, and a small number of patients with poor initial treatments presented with improved clinical symptoms during the 10–30 months after treatment.</p
<p>Progress of 10 patients after treatment, as to age and clinical, roentnologic, and global outcome...
Outcomes at 12 months follow-up compared between the intervention and the control groups.</p
<p><b>A</b>, For each individual patient (n = 36), the time point at which he/she asked for a subseq...
<p>Percentage of all patients diagnosed by visit 2 (assumed 5 days after first visit), by visit 3 (a...
<p><i>P</i><sub>a</sub> = 0.186.</p><p><i>P</i><sub>b</sub> = 0.127.</p><p><i>P</i><sub>c</sub> = 0....
<p>LVEF on admission, improvement during the in-hospital phase, and after a mean follow-up duration ...
After the publication of this work [1], it was brought to our attention that the time for patient fo...
<p>Clinical changes over treatment period of 16 weeks are shown. Four of the five patients showed im...
<p>* Treatment after 48, 72 and 96 hours from surfacing showed no significant differences in clinica...
<p>Description of follow-up time in years for study patients on anti-retroviral therapy (n = 1,282)....
<p>The follow-up period started after the first revision (m = months). In the series of Flint et al....
<p>Improvement of clinical pathology and of life quality four weeks after treatment (n = 46).</p
patients concerned. Long-term follow-up of 22 patients showed continuing improvements in
<p>Timing of response to treatment evaluation after treatment intensification (number of patients pe...
Aim. The importance of developing reliable models and predictors of change in psychotherapy has been...
<p>Progress of 10 patients after treatment, as to age and clinical, roentnologic, and global outcome...
Outcomes at 12 months follow-up compared between the intervention and the control groups.</p
<p><b>A</b>, For each individual patient (n = 36), the time point at which he/she asked for a subseq...
<p>Percentage of all patients diagnosed by visit 2 (assumed 5 days after first visit), by visit 3 (a...
<p><i>P</i><sub>a</sub> = 0.186.</p><p><i>P</i><sub>b</sub> = 0.127.</p><p><i>P</i><sub>c</sub> = 0....
<p>LVEF on admission, improvement during the in-hospital phase, and after a mean follow-up duration ...
After the publication of this work [1], it was brought to our attention that the time for patient fo...
<p>Clinical changes over treatment period of 16 weeks are shown. Four of the five patients showed im...
<p>* Treatment after 48, 72 and 96 hours from surfacing showed no significant differences in clinica...
<p>Description of follow-up time in years for study patients on anti-retroviral therapy (n = 1,282)....
<p>The follow-up period started after the first revision (m = months). In the series of Flint et al....
<p>Improvement of clinical pathology and of life quality four weeks after treatment (n = 46).</p
patients concerned. Long-term follow-up of 22 patients showed continuing improvements in
<p>Timing of response to treatment evaluation after treatment intensification (number of patients pe...
Aim. The importance of developing reliable models and predictors of change in psychotherapy has been...
<p>Progress of 10 patients after treatment, as to age and clinical, roentnologic, and global outcome...
Outcomes at 12 months follow-up compared between the intervention and the control groups.</p
<p><b>A</b>, For each individual patient (n = 36), the time point at which he/she asked for a subseq...