<p><i>P</i><sub>a</sub> = 0.186.</p><p><i>P</i><sub>b</sub> = 0.127.</p><p><i>P</i><sub>c</sub> = 0.553.</p
<p>For binary outcomes, summaries are presented as number (percent) and treatment effects as odds ra...
<p>The total QUALID score and the subscale QUALID scores at baseline and 10 months follow-up for the...
Major clinical outcomes of study population during the follow-up period according to noninvasive sco...
<p>* P<0.05 in comparison with PREDICT-STABLE 0–3.</p><p>Clinical outcome after 30 days and 1 year o...
Most of the patients experienced an improving trend in clinical symptoms within 9 months after the f...
<p>* Clinical outcome was not significantly different between the delayed and early groups (<i>χ</i>...
<p><sup>†</sup> adjusted for propensity score</p><p><sup>§</sup> anyone of myocardial infarction, is...
<p>Treatment outcomes for all patients on ART at tertiary and secondary health facilities at 0–12 mo...
Outcomes at 12 months follow-up compared between the intervention and the control groups.</p
Clinical outcomes of all included patients (A) and patients readmitted to ICU (B).</p
<p>All patients with incomplete collaterals showed unfavorable outcome at 3 months. Patients with co...
<p>Treatment outcomes for all patients on ART at tertiary and secondary health facilities at 13–24 m...
<p>A: prediction results and error range in the D14_ALP model. B: Prediction results and error range...
<p>Reference outcomes for Usual Care and New Intervention, per patient after 12 cycles—Mean (Standar...
The proportions of each clinical outcome in the different follow-up interval groups.</p
<p>For binary outcomes, summaries are presented as number (percent) and treatment effects as odds ra...
<p>The total QUALID score and the subscale QUALID scores at baseline and 10 months follow-up for the...
Major clinical outcomes of study population during the follow-up period according to noninvasive sco...
<p>* P<0.05 in comparison with PREDICT-STABLE 0–3.</p><p>Clinical outcome after 30 days and 1 year o...
Most of the patients experienced an improving trend in clinical symptoms within 9 months after the f...
<p>* Clinical outcome was not significantly different between the delayed and early groups (<i>χ</i>...
<p><sup>†</sup> adjusted for propensity score</p><p><sup>§</sup> anyone of myocardial infarction, is...
<p>Treatment outcomes for all patients on ART at tertiary and secondary health facilities at 0–12 mo...
Outcomes at 12 months follow-up compared between the intervention and the control groups.</p
Clinical outcomes of all included patients (A) and patients readmitted to ICU (B).</p
<p>All patients with incomplete collaterals showed unfavorable outcome at 3 months. Patients with co...
<p>Treatment outcomes for all patients on ART at tertiary and secondary health facilities at 13–24 m...
<p>A: prediction results and error range in the D14_ALP model. B: Prediction results and error range...
<p>Reference outcomes for Usual Care and New Intervention, per patient after 12 cycles—Mean (Standar...
The proportions of each clinical outcome in the different follow-up interval groups.</p
<p>For binary outcomes, summaries are presented as number (percent) and treatment effects as odds ra...
<p>The total QUALID score and the subscale QUALID scores at baseline and 10 months follow-up for the...
Major clinical outcomes of study population during the follow-up period according to noninvasive sco...
DOI
Add to ORKG