Comparison of non-zero maize production pixels between original and robustness test estimates.</p
Comparison of crack optimization results using different image recognition methods.</p
Comparison of crack optimization results using different image recognition methods.</p
Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p
Correlations between different model estimated pixel specific maize fractions.</p
<p>The comparison experimental results (pixel accuracy, mean accuracy, and mean IoU) of the SIEANs w...
Spatial sensitivity of production to each robustness run relative to original estimates.</p
<p>Comparison of the FQ grades as evaluated by both methods with the crop yield grades.</p
Pixel level maize fraction predictions for the United States using the estimated pixel-specific maiz...
Comparison between the predicted maize area fraction versus observed FAO maize area fraction at Admi...
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.1 noisy ratio.</p
Descriptive statistics of the biophysical variables measured at the pixel level.</p
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.1 noisy ratio.</p
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.5 noisy ratio.</p
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.5 noisy ratio.</p
Comparison of the robustness (BER % and NCC) of different steganography techniques.</p
Comparison of crack optimization results using different image recognition methods.</p
Comparison of crack optimization results using different image recognition methods.</p
Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p
Correlations between different model estimated pixel specific maize fractions.</p
<p>The comparison experimental results (pixel accuracy, mean accuracy, and mean IoU) of the SIEANs w...
Spatial sensitivity of production to each robustness run relative to original estimates.</p
<p>Comparison of the FQ grades as evaluated by both methods with the crop yield grades.</p
Pixel level maize fraction predictions for the United States using the estimated pixel-specific maiz...
Comparison between the predicted maize area fraction versus observed FAO maize area fraction at Admi...
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.1 noisy ratio.</p
Descriptive statistics of the biophysical variables measured at the pixel level.</p
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.1 noisy ratio.</p
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.5 noisy ratio.</p
Results of evaulate metrics on the breast cancer test data and 0.5 noisy ratio.</p
Comparison of the robustness (BER % and NCC) of different steganography techniques.</p
Comparison of crack optimization results using different image recognition methods.</p
Comparison of crack optimization results using different image recognition methods.</p
Performance comparison of a species-specific predictor using the test dataset.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG